MYSTRIK'S
BLOG
The Value of Logic in Belief
Belief systems often rely on logic to differentiate between faith and convictions. Traditional supernatural religions base their beliefs on the existence of one or more gods, a concept that lacks empirical evidence and falsifiability. Mystrikism, on the other hand, is rooted in naturalism and reason, and values the scientific method as its cornerstone.
The foundational difference between these two belief systems raises important questions, particularly in the context of the principles of Mystrikism. A hypothesis must withstand rigorous scrutiny and empirical testing to be sound, and the concept of a supernatural deity fails to meet this criterion.
This divergence becomes more apparent when considering the ethical and "spiritual" constructs derived from these premises. In supernatural religions, morals and values often stem from the decrees or characteristics of the deity, but lack universality and stability. In contrast, Mystrikism bases its ethical framework on observable and natural phenomena, leading to a more universally accessible and verifiable moral structure. Moreover, Mystrikism's emphasis on naturalism and reality aligns with a logical understanding of the universe. It replaces the unverifiable with the verifiable, and the mystical with the tangible. This shift not only grounds Mystrikism in reality but also reinforces its intellectual robustness.
In conclusion, the value of logic in belief systems is paramount. Logic separates the unsubstantiated from the substantiated, guiding believers towards a more grounded and intellectually honest understanding of the universe and their place within it.
How Mystrikism has Changed Me?
Starting The Union of Mystriks and embracing Mystrikism marked the beginning of an unexpected personal transformation for me, rooted in the principles of kindness, scientific inquiry, and natural "spirituality". This journey began with a vision to create a "spiritual" community that values rational thought and empirical evidence, standing as an alternative to traditional supernatural religions. Through Mystrikism, I sought to explore a more grounded and realistic approach to "spirituality", emphasising ethics and morals derived from the natural world and scientific understanding.
As I delve deeper into the creation of the Union and the practice of Mystrikism, I notice significant changes within myself. These changes are surprising and unexpected, yet, in hindsight, entirely predictable, given the depth of my trust and confidence in the project.
At first, without being fully aware, my approach to life is starting to align more closely with the ideals of Mystrikism, significantly affecting my mental state and behaviours. I have always intellectually and philosophically known about the power of kindness. I'm what you would call a happy-go-lucky person, and I tried my best, like everyone, to be nice to people. There were always those problematic people with whom I needed help being perfectly friendly. My default level of compassion mostly came from my innate personality, the fear of being disliked, and a pathological desire to be liked.
The principles of patience, kindness, and compassion, central to Mystrikism, however, started to extend far beyond their usual limits in my life, driven by a desire to embody the life of a Mystrik. This shift isn't just a conscious effort but also seems to occur through philosophical osmosis, where the ideals I hold dear gradually flow through to my thoughts and actions.
This osmotic influence of Mystrikism also manifests in my approach to knowledge and understanding. Embracing the scientific method and its internal philosophies of verificationism and falsificationism leads me to adopt a more cautious and thoughtful stance toward forming conclusions. This isn't a rejection of my previous values, as I already knew its value, but an enhancement integrating a deep respect for empirical evidence into my cognitive methodology.
Moreover, as the expression goes, my desire to stop and "smell the roses" has also deepened and become more frequent (Aweism). Mystrikism deepens my appreciation for the natural world, enriching my experiences of awe and wonder. I now break more often to marvel at those moments of natural "spiritual" transcendence, connection and wonder. I take long pauses to experience these occurrences and readily seek them out. I always did, but the scope of the feelings I now experience and the time I subconsciously and consciously devote to them have been magnified.
Despite these positive changes, it's crucial to acknowledge my flaws and limitations. I am an incredibly ordinary human, grappling with fear, envy, greed, hate and other less admirable traits. Yet, Mystrikism is gradually guiding me toward becoming a better person, not through denial of these flaws but by providing a path toward improvement. Like all of us who try to take active steps to be better people, do less harm, bring more joy and see the world with greater clarity, I will fail, but not utterly. It's about identifying the most rational, "spiritual", and compassionate ideal and heading towards it as best you can. A Mystrik uses the ideals of Mystrikism like beacons on the path up a dark, ragged mountain. The closer we get to the top, the better the world becomes, and we become better people along the way.
Believe it or not, I created Mystrikism to offer a sensible rival to traditional superstitious religions. Mystrikism offers realistic "spirituality" that is natural, not supernatural, combined with clear morals and ethics to employ based on the methods of science, with kindness as its overarching prime directive. We are a community to belong to and a place to be amongst those on the same page.
What I was surprised to find out was how this whole notion was going to change me. I am often overwhelmed and chuffed about this. I'm reminded of the Nietzsche quote "if you gaze long into an abyss, the abyss also gazes into you". I always interpreted that to mean our focus shapes our thoughts, feelings, and behaviours. We are not hunting monsters, however. We are seeking kindness, beauty and the best approximate truth.
Navigating the Paradox of Dogmatism in Mystrikism
The essence of Mystrikism, a philosophy that intertwines the reverence for nature with the rigours of scientific inquiry, raises an intriguing question: Does it, despite its foundational principles, inadvertently fall into the traditional pitfalls of doctrinal dogmatism? This question probes the heart of what makes Mystrikism both unique and paradoxical, especially when it positions itself against the backdrop of other belief systems that have long been critiqued for their unwavering dogmas.
At the core of Mystrikism lie principles that emphasise kindness, naturalism, honesty, reverence, and a scientific approach to understanding reality. These tenets, while technically dogmatic, are designed to foster a framework of inquiry and understanding that is fundamentally non-dogmatic. The Union's commitment to the scientific method, a process inherently about questioning, reevaluating, and revising our understanding of the world, illustrates a profound paradox: Mystrikism is dogmatic about its non-dogmatism.
This unique stance of Mystrikism, where dogmatic beliefs pivot around the principle of open inquiry, is not a flaw but rather a deliberate synthesis of stability and adaptability within a belief system. Our doctrine delineates a set of non-negotiable values and methods, such as the importance of kindness, the adherence to naturalism, and the reliance on scientific inquiry. However, it asserts that the knowledge and conclusions derived from these methods are perpetually open to scrutiny, challenge, and revision. This approach underscores a nuanced form of dogmatism, which is steadfast in its methodology rather than immutable and absolute truths about the universe.
Far from stifling inquiry, Mystrikism's structured framework within which inquiry occurs encourages a dynamic exploration of the world. It champions intellectual honesty, humility, and the readiness to adapt beliefs in light of new evidence, reflecting a commitment to growth, learning, and the evolution of thought. This adaptability is crucial in a world where scientific discoveries continuously reshape our understanding, showcasing Mystrikism's dedication to a living, evolving understanding of approximate truth that is free from the constraints of traditional dogma.
Moreover, Mystrikism acknowledges human fallibility and cognitive biases, advocating for a process of continual re-examination and intellectual growth. This acknowledgment not only enriches its philosophical foundation but also ensures that its principles remain relevant and responsive to new discoveries and insights.
Mystrikism navigates the paradox of dogmatism with remarkable finesse, presenting a dogmatic belief system in its commitment to open-ended inquiry and the provisional nature of knowledge. By doing so, it avoids the trap of traditional religious dogmatism, offering instead a path that balances the stability provided by core principles with the flexibility and humility required to adapt and evolve. This approach sets Mystrikism apart, making it a compelling and refreshingly rational "spiritual" philosophy.
Trust vs Faith - Mystriks Choose Trust every time
Blind faith and earned trust represent two fundamentally different approaches to belief and knowledge. Blind faith, the simpler of the two, is belief without evidence or scrutiny, often passed down through tradition or authority without question. It's akin to accepting a story as truth because it's been told and retold, not because it's been proven. This approach can be comforting but is criticised for lacking depth and fostering gullibility.
Earned trust, however, results from rigorous questioning, testing, and evidence gathering. It's about engaging with ideas critically, applying the scientific method to sift through claims, and only holding onto those that can stand up to scrutiny. This form of trust is dynamic, always open to reevaluation in the light of new evidence, and values a concept's ability to predict future events and explain past occurrences.
The distinction between these two lies in the acquisition method and their impact on individuals and societies. Blind faith can lead to dogmatism and intolerance, while earned trust fosters a culture of inquiry, scepticism, and openness to change. In a world increasingly defined by complexity and ambiguity, the shift from unearned faith to cognisant trust represents a move towards a more thoughtful, evidence-based approach to understanding the world around us.
Mystrikism is Universal because it is Sensible
The world's spirituality and religious beliefs are as diverse as its inhabitants. Mystrikism proposes an approach to "spirituality" that is both universally applicable and already deeply ingrained in the standard practices of humanity, regardless of cultural or religious background. We assert that, at its core, Mystrikism embodies the most rational and universally practised set of principles, making it the most sensible religious identity one can find.
The Pillars of Mystrikism
At the heart of Mystrikism are five foundational pillars that are universally practised to some degree by everyone, making it distinct from other religious or spiritual beliefs:
1. Kindness and Compassion: These intrinsic human values transcend cultural and religious boundaries, fostering a sense of community and empathy among individuals.
2. Scientific Inquiry: It champions scientific methods to uncover truths about the world, emphasising rationality and evidence-based understanding.
3. Naturalism: Mystrikism posits that everything in the universe is natural, dismissing supernatural explanations in favour of understanding the world through natural phenomena.
4. Appreciation of Natural Beauty: Mystrikism encourages a profound appreciation for the beauty of the natural world, seeing it as a source of inspiration and wonder.
5. Humility for the Unknown: Unlike traditional religions that may fear the unknown, Mystrikism advocates for a respectful and awe-inspired approach to the mysteries that have yet to be understood, encouraging curiosity and open-mindedness.
Critique of Traditional and New Age Beliefs:
Mystrikism critiques traditional supernatural religions and new age ideas as irrational constructs, likened to crudely shaped obelisks, sculpted by many without a coherent rationale. We argue that a clear-eyed and industrious sculptor would discover beneath the layers of superstitious beliefs and practices lies the adamantine essence of Mystrikism, a dogma that is both rational and universal. This metaphor suggests that while many religious and spiritual traditions may seem disparate or nonsensical, they are all, in some way, failed attempts to uncover the same underlying principles that Mystrikism openly embraces.
The Universal Subconscious Practice:
Mystrikal principles are already subconsciously practised by everyone, including those who are particularly devout or pious members of superstitious religions. We argue that even in moments dominated by religious fervour, individuals live according to the principles of Mystrikism without even realising it. Mystrikism's tenets are already embedded in the fabric of reasonable human behaviour and thought, transcending conscious religious affiliations.
Universal acts like sharing food with those in need, the innate curiosity that drives us to learn, our shared awe at natural phenomena, such as the changing seasons or a starry night, are perfect examples. These everyday behaviours and experiences highlight the subconscious, yet widespread, practice of Mystrikism’s principles across different societies.
A Call to Maturity
The message of Mystrikism is not just a philosophical stance but a call to action. We encourage humanity to grow up and reevaluate its collective belief systems, encouraging a shift towards a more rational, evidence-based understanding of the world. This call to maturity is about fostering a more sensible and mature approach to human life.
Life, the Universe and Everything
At the heart of Mystrikism lies a profound acknowledgment of the limits of our current understanding of the universe. Before delving into the nuanced responses to traditional theistic arguments, it is essential to state unequivocally that, in the pursuit of understanding the origins of the universe and life, we simply do not know, yet. This humility before the vast unknown is not a resignation but a catalyst for deeper inquiry. Scientists operate within the realm of verifiable evidence, crafting hypotheses, engaging in robust discussions, and conducting experiments. Despite the tremendous strides in knowledge, the ultimate answers to how the universe began or how life emerged remain elusive. Mystrikism asserts that if these answers are ever to be discovered, they will be uncovered through the meticulous application of the scientific method, not presupposed by theological assertions.
This foundational stance is coupled with a radical reconsideration of beginnings and ends as human constructs, heavily influenced by our own experiences of birth and death. Mystrikism proposes an intriguing perspective: what if the concept of beginnings and ends reflects our human tendency to anthropomorphise the cosmos?
Mystrikism invites us to look beyond our linear perceptions of existence. From the moment of our birth, influenced by our parent’s DNA, to the sustenance we derive from the earth and eventually to how our physical forms return to the earth, life is a continuum. This cycle, devoid of true beginnings or ends, mirrors the broader processes observed in nature and the universe. The materials that constitute our being have been part of the cosmos for eons and will continue to exist in various forms long after our departure. In this sense, existence is not a straight line but a circular or spiral journey, echoing the expression that “history doesn’t repeat itself, but it often rhymes.”
Here, we explore and respond to several classical theist arguments positing a divine creator, responding with perspectives grounded in naturalism and supported by scientific evidence.
1. First Cause or Cosmological Argument
Theistic View: Everything that begins to exist has a cause; therefore, the universe must have a divine cause.
Mystrikal Response: Mystrikism, aligning with astrophysical insights, acknowledges the human tendency to seek beginnings and causality. However, invoking a deity as the uncaused cause introduces an arbitrary exception to the universal principle of causality. The field of quantum mechanics hypothesises that particles can emerge from “nothing,” challenging the necessity of a divine initiator. This perspective not only adheres to Occam’s Razor, favouring simpler explanations without unnecessary entities.
2. Teleological Argument or Argument from Design
Theistic View: The complexity and order of the universe imply a designer.
Mystrikal Response: Mystrikism appreciates the intricate beauty of the universe, seeing it not as evidence of design but as the outcome of natural laws. Evolution by natural selection demonstrates how complexity can arise without a designer, a process observable in the diversity of life on Earth. The weak anthropic principle further rationalises the universe’s fine-tuning as a prerequisite for our existence to ponder it rather than a marker of design. This stance encourages a humble appreciation of the universe’s wonders, grounded in naturalistic explanations.
3. Argument from Morality
Theistic View: Objective moral values indicate a divine lawgiver.
Mystrikal Response: Mystrikism views morality as a natural phenomenon emerging from human social evolution and cultural development. Ethical norms evolve to enhance well-being and facilitate cooperation and social cohesion, a perspective supported by evolutionary psychology and measurable by science. This naturalistic understanding of morality fosters a sense of shared humanity and ethical responsibility, free from the constraints of divine command theory.
4. Argument from Consciousness
Theistic View: Consciousness’s subjective experience points to a divine spark.
Mystrikal Response: Drawing on neuroscientific research, Mystrikism interprets consciousness as an emergent property of complex neural processes. This view aligns with materialistic explanations for consciousness, challenging the notion of a soul or divine essence. The ongoing exploration of the brain’s mysteries embodies Mystrikism’s reverence for the unknown, emphasising empirical inquiry over supernatural speculation.
5. Argument from Religious Experience
Theistic View: Personal encounters with the divine validate religious beliefs.
Mystrikal Response: While acknowledging the profound impact of religious experiences, Mystrikism attributes these experiences to the rich tapestry of human psychology and cultural context. Similar experiences can be induced through various means, suggesting they originate from human cognition rather than divine sources. This perspective values the depth of human experience while advocating for a naturalistic understanding of these phenomena.
6. Argument from Historical and Scriptural Claims
Theistic View: Religious texts and prophecies confirm divine intervention.
Mystrikal Response: Mystrikism approaches scriptural claims with a critical eye, prioritising empirical evidence and historical analysis. The mythological nature of many scriptural stories, alongside their contradictions with scientific understanding, suggests these narratives are merely early human attempts to explain the natural world. This critique underscores Mystrikism’s commitment to a reality grounded in observable phenomena and verifiable facts.
7. Argument from the Existence of the Universe and Life (Abiogenesis)
Theistic View: The improbability of life arising from non-life suggests a divine creator.
Mystrikal Response: Mystrikism embraces the scientific exploration of abiogenesis, viewing the natural emergence of life as a testament to the universe’s inherent potential. Scientific research into abiogenesis, though still unfolding, offers promising natural explanations for life’s origins. This approach exemplifies Mystrikism’s dedication to understanding the universe through the lens of natural processes, eschewing supernatural explanations in favour of empirical inquiry.
The Union of Mystriks, through the lens of Mystrikism, invites a reexamination of our most fundamental assumptions about the universe, life, and consciousness. By embracing the limits of our current knowledge and questioning the very constructs of beginnings and ends, Mystrikism fosters a worldview that is at once grounded in scientific inquiry and open to the boundless mysteries of existence. This approach does not seek to dispel the wonder of the cosmos with easy answers but to deepen our reverence for it through a continuous quest for understanding, guided by the principles of honesty, reverence, and the "spirited" pursuit of knowledge that defines Mystrikism.
Navigating Recovery through the Lens of Mystrikism
by Andy F
An agnostic's path in Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) can be fraught with scepticism, especially when the twelve steps' references to a higher power evoke memories of a rigid religious upbringing. Such was the case for me, whose early encounters with religion were marked by a lack of acceptance and the absence of God's love in a strictly Catholic foster home and, later, a monastery boarding school. My rejection of God and religion by the age of ten was a direct response to these experiences, and this scepticism followed me into my initial foray into AA.
A Skeptic in Recovery:
Upon encountering the God-centric language of the twelve steps, my old resentments were instantly reignited. The mention of God in five of the twelve steps and the allusion to a higher power in another seemed like insurmountable barriers to my recovery. Thus, I sought refuge in therapy, only to find, after a decade, that it exacerbated my wounds rather than healing them. My problem lay not in the treatment but in my reluctance to accept responsibility for the life I had created.
The Pursuit of External Solutions:
In the years that followed, I sought solace in sex, power, food, money, and codependent relationships, each a temporary fix for my inner emptiness. My compulsions only led to more chaos, from my struggle with sex addicition to dependencies on sugar and chaotic relationships. All of these eventually left me feeling more isolated and suicidal when I realized how temporary all these external fixes were.
A Crisis of Powerlessness:
Amidst this turmoil, I continued to chase professional success, driven by a deep-seated need to prove my worth and bolster my low self-esteem through career achievements. However, the lack of personal confidence and power became painfully evident, leaving me trapped in a cycle of unmanageability and failure, particularly in romance and finance.
The Turning Point - A New Direction:
It was only after thirteen years of self-sponsorship and unrelenting misery that I reached an all-time low. My persistent attempts to recover on my terms had failed, leading to a profound moment of surrender. Desperate for change, I sought the guidance of David B, a sponsor known for his rigorous approach. David presented me with a lifeline: to view AA itself as a higher power, offering a new perspective that required no immediate belief in God.
Mystrikism and the Path to a Non-God-Centered "Spiritual" Awakening:
David's approach has similarities with the principles of Mystrikism, a philosophy I recently encountered that emphasises the unknown as a concept and power greater than ourselves. Mystrikism, with its foundation in naturalism and the scientific method, provides a framework that allows one to embrace a higher power without resorting to supernatural explanations. Mystrikism challenges traditional religious notions while fostering a community of kindness and inquiry.
Embracing the Unknown:
The vast mystery, such as that feeling of awe and respect you get from looking at a clear starry sky, symbolizes their higher power. It dwarfs any ego and connects to the larger fabric of the universe. Mystrikism’s challenge to conventional religious practices can fortify recovery, providing a sense of belonging in a community that values empirical evidence and a deep reverence for the natural world.
A Happy Destiny Reimagined:
Through my work with David and subsequent sponsors, Jamie and Witek, both open to supporting an agnostic, I experienced a non-God-centered "spiritual" awakening that has transformed my life. Today, I not only enjoy a fulfilling career and a stable, loving relationship but also serve as a sponsor to others in AA.
Mystrikism and the Union of Mystriks can enrich your understanding of the twelve steps, demonstrating that recovery is possible whether one believes in God or not. As I continue to navigate "the road of happy destiny," the twelve promises of the Big Book manifest in my life, affirming that as long as I trust in the program, clean house, and help others, I can thrive as a satisfied sober agnostic through the twelve step program.
In fellowship,
Andy F
Employing Kindness in Difficult Situations
Kindness, in its essence, is a universal virtue, recognised and valued across cultures and societies for its ability to promote empathy, understanding, and connection among individuals. Its power lies not only in the joy and comfort it brings to recipients but also in the profound impact it has on those who give it. Yet, the true potential of kindness extends far beyond the ordinary and expected exchanges of goodwill. It achieves its greatest strength and transformative capability when offered in the most challenging circumstances, when it is least expected and, arguably when it is perceived as undeserved. In these moments, kindness acts as a catalyst, breaking down barriers and illuminating the shared humanity that connects us all. This extraordinary application of kindness can alter perceptions, change trajectories of interaction, and profoundly affect both the giver and the receiver. It's in these least-expected contexts that kindness reveals its ability to heal, inspire, and create waves of positive change that ripple through communities and societies.
Employing the "pause", as described in the context of dealing with difficult situations or people, is a moment of intentional reflection and restraint. It acts as a strategic breather, allowing you to step back from the immediacy of your reactions and emotions. This pause serves multiple purposes: it gives you time to calm down, reducing the likelihood of a knee-jerk or emotionally charged response. During this pause, you reflect on the kind of person you aspire to be, aligning your actions with your core values and principles as a Mystrik who values kindness, honesty, and humility.
Moreover, this pause enables you to empathise with the other person, fostering a deeper understanding of their motivations and struggles. By considering questions like "Why are they behaving this way? Is their behaviour rooted in pain or fear? When was the last time they experienced genuine kindness?", you open the door to compassion. This approach encourages you to see beyond the surface level of difficult behaviour, recognising the humanity and vulnerabilities in others. Above all, it gives you space to confront and set aside your ego and pride, questioning whether they are serving any useful function.
Let's explore studies demonstrating the positive impact of kindness, especially in challenging situations:
-
The impact of prosocial behaviour on physical health: A study by Post (2005) in "Altruism, Happiness, and Health: It's Good to Be Good" examined how engaging in acts of kindness has direct health benefits for the individual, including stress reduction and improved heart health. This research suggests that kindness, especially when it challenges us, can have profound physiological and psychological benefits.
-
Kindness and its effects on the brain: Research by Davidson and Schuyler (2015) explored how acts of kindness and compassion meditation activate regions of the brain associated with empathy and emotional regulation. Their findings indicate that kindness, even in the face of negativity, can enhance emotional resilience and well-being.
-
Social and relational impacts of kindness: Studies on the "helper's high," such as those by Luks (1988), have found that helping others can produce positive emotions and enhance social connection. This research supports the idea that being kind, especially when it's difficult, can strengthen relationships and foster a sense of community.
-
Kindness in organisational settings: Research by Fowler and Christakis (2010) in "Cooperative behaviour cascades in human social networks" demonstrated that kindness is contagious and can influence groups and communities, leading to more cooperative and positive social environments. This supports the notion that kindness in challenging situations can have a ripple effect, improving organisational and social dynamics.
These studies collectively underscore the transformative power of kindness, not just for the recipients but also for the individuals practising it. Engaging in acts of kindness, particularly in difficult situations, can promote physical and emotional well-being, enhance social connections, and foster a more compassionate and understanding community.
The Necessity of Mystrikism
In the evolving landscape of belief systems, Mystrikism faces criticism for its rational and sensible foundation, leading some to question its necessity. This essay addresses these concerns, illustrating why Mystrikism is essential despite its practical nature.
The Structured Ethical Framework
Mystrikism's core values of kindness, honesty, humility, and inspiration form a cohesive ethical framework. This structure provides clear guidance for ethical living and decision-making, integrating rational thought with deep-seated moral principles. Unlike informal secular philosophies, Mystrikism offers a defined system that supports individuals in navigating complex moral landscapes. Plus, let's face it, having a structured guide is a relief for those who panic at the sight of an ethical dilemma.
Fostering Community
One of Mystrikism's primary functions is creating a sense of community and belonging. It provides a sanctuary for individuals who value rational inquiry, scientific understanding, and natural "spirituality." This communal aspect is vital for human well-being, offering social support, shared rituals, and ceremonies that mark significant life events, strengthening social bonds and enhancing individual and collective resilience. After all, even the most sensible people need friends, right?
Addressing the Need for Meaning
Humans inherently seek meaning and purpose. While rational thought provides clarity, it often lacks the emotional and "spiritual" fulfilment derived from a connection to something greater. Mystrikism bridges this gap by promoting a profound connection to the natural world and the cosmos, enriching the rational and empirical understanding of reality with a sense of awe and wonder. We may not have supernatural beings, but the universe is impressive enough on its own.
Balancing Rationality and Empathy
Pure rationality can sometimes seem detached. Mystrikism integrates empathy and compassion into its rational framework, ensuring that logical thought is always tempered by kindness and humanistic values. This balance fosters a humane and just society where ethical considerations and scientific understanding coexist harmoniously. Because, let’s be honest, nobody likes a know-it-all who forgets to be nice.
Encouraging Continuous Growth
Mystrikism promotes continuous inquiry and the pursuit of knowledge through the scientific method. This commitment to learning and growth is essential for personal development and societal progress. Unlike static belief systems, Mystrikism remains adaptable and open to discoveries, ensuring its principles evolve with human understanding and scientific advancements. We’re the adaptable chameleons of the belief system world.
Inclusivity and Diversity
Mystrikism welcomes individuals from diverse backgrounds, fostering a unifying platform transcending traditional religious divisions. This inclusivity promotes mutual respect and understanding, enhancing social cohesion and contributing to a more harmonious world. We’re like the social butterflies of rational thought, always making new friends.
Mystrikism, with its rational foundation, redefines what it means to be a religion in the modern world. It offers a structured ethical framework, a sense of community, and a profound connection to the natural world, addressing essential human needs for meaning, belonging, and growth. Despite its sensible nature, Mystrikism is necessary for providing a balanced and inclusive approach to living, harmonising rational thought with "spiritual" experiences. This integration makes Mystrikism a compelling and necessary alternative in today's diverse and evolving society, enriching the human experience with integrity and wonder. Because, in the end, even the most sensible among us need a little magic in the mundane.
Rational Non-theism - Angry Atheists
In the Union of Mystriks, we identify as agnostic non-theists. This means that while we do not hold a belief in any gods, we also acknowledge the limits of our knowledge and the vastness of the unknown. Our stance is rooted in humility and respect for the infinite mysteries of the cosmos, aligning with the philosophical principles of verificationism and falsificationism. The god hypothesis, so far, has not been scientifically verified, nor is it scientifically falsifiable. As a result, because we don’t know (agnostic), we don’t believe (atheist). The scope and subsequent implications of this particular hypothesis especially demand our strict adherence to the methods of science.
While non-theism and atheism is clearly a rational conclusions, individuals’ paths to reach it are not always grounded in reason. The reasons behind our beliefs are crucial, as they shape our understanding and approach to reality. Some common irrational ways people arrive at atheism include:
-
Rebellion Against Authority: Rejecting the concept of gods as a form of rebellion against religious or parental authority rather than through logical reasoning.
-
Emotional Reaction to Trauma: Turning to atheism as an emotional response to negative experiences with religion, such as abuse or hypocrisy, without critically examining the underlying beliefs.
-
Peer Influence: Adopting atheism to fit in with a social group or because it is perceived as trendy rather than through personal intellectual exploration.
-
Misinformation: Embracing atheism based on misconceptions or incomplete understanding of religious doctrines and scientific principles.
It's important to recognise that some people become atheists due to a lack of respect for authority or as an emotional reaction to past hurts. These individuals often have an over-heightened sensitivity to ideas that, on the surface, merely resemble irrationality, reacting strongly against anything that seems superficially unscientific or unfounded. This can lead to a hostile, reactive and dismissive attitude towards all new ideas. Identifying these emotional and psychological factors is crucial for understanding the diverse motivations behind different types of agnostic unbelief and fostering a more inclusive, rational and empathetic community.
While non-theism and atheism is a rational conclusion for many, the journey to this belief can be fraught with irrational motives. Mystrikism advocates for a thoughtful and reasoned approach via non-theism rooted in evidence, humility, and a profound sense of wonder at the mysteries of the universe.
Kindness is Reason - Love is Feeling
Love, a profound and multifaceted emotion, is a transformative feeling that enriches our lives and strengthens our connections. Characterised by deep affection and emotional bonds, it evokes feelings of warmth, tenderness, and attachment. Love creates a sense of security and belonging, nurturing deep bonds and bringing a sense of completeness and fulfilment.
Love is a common thread running through many philosophies and religions. Judaism and Christianity teach, "Love your neighbour as yourself." Buddhism advocates compassion and loving-kindness. Hinduism promotes non-violence (ahimsa). Islam encourages mercy, with their Prophet Muhammad saying, "Love for your brother what you love for yourself." Sikhism stresses universal love, while New Age philosophies call it a "universal solvent." Taoism also emphasises deep love in harmony with the Tao. These examples show that love is a universal concept transcending cultural and religious boundaries, connecting us all in our shared humanity.
Mystrikism admires love like any other philosophy or religion, but it is not the centrepiece of our doctrine. Our focus is on kindness. In many belief systems, love is the driving force behind kindness, encouraging adherents to emulate the love shown by their deities or theological role models, such as Jesus, Buddha, Mohammad, and the principles of Tao, for a short list of examples.
In the Union, kindness is viewed through a different lens. Our doctrine sees kindness as an act of reason and rationality potentially independent of any feeling. The human capacity to perform acts of empathy and compassion towards someone or something for whom we do not possess feelings of love in any of its incarnations clearly indicates that kindness is not bound by love. Love can make kindness easier and feel more natural, but it is not a prerequisite. This perspective can open our minds to new ways of understanding and practising kindness.
To a Mystrik, kindness is an act of reason because it promotes cooperation, trust, and social cohesion, making society function more effectively. These qualities enhance human interactions, reduce conflict, and promote well-being, addressing emotional and psychological needs. This facilitates our ultimate purpose, uncovering the beauty of reality and comprehending the universe.
Showing compassion towards those we may feel antipathy or enmity for is often the most potent version of kindness. It breaks down barriers of hostility and promotes understanding, reconciliation and healing. This kind of empathy helps defuse conflicts, reduce tensions, and create a more peaceful environment. It sets a powerful example for others, encouraging a culture of respect and tolerance. By choosing to act with kindness, we demonstrate the strength of our character and the capacity for reason to override animal passions, ultimately contributing to a more just and harmonious society. This can only be achieved if we choose kindness not merely as a byproduct of love but as a deliberate act of reason.
Needless to say, we are not anti-love by any means; that would be absurd. Love is one of the most amazing and noble feelings any sentient being can experience and express, an example of Aweism that transcends the ordinary, something to be savoured. However, Mystrikism holds that if our decision to be kind depends on possessing a feeling, it can ultimately become selfish, unreasonable and limited. It can reach the point where the decision to show charity and empathy is no longer ours; it is in the ephemeral hands of our emotions and affections.
Why Did We Bother Creating Mystrikism?
Mystikism was founded to offer a genuine and rational alternative to religion. Most alternatives to religion usually entail merely no religion, agnosticism, non-theism, atheism or, at best, humanism. These intellectual positions are primarily conclusions based on evidence or lack thereof. Despite their flawless logic, they are empty of morality, purpose and meaning. Humanism is one possible exception. Still, considering its anthropocentrism, lack of "spirituality" and no clear system of ethics leave it open to criticisms of shortsightedness and superficiality.
Creating the Union of Mystriks is an attempt to fulfil the sentiments behind the phrase "Be the change you want to see in the world." A silent, significant, and growing portion of humanity searches, perhaps even yearns, for an identity to align with and a doctrine to live by that doesn't cling to old-world superstitions. Mystrikism is about making a meaningful and organised change in how we think and live while still being able to savour and enjoy those sublime moments that transcend the ordinary. Humanity does not have to throw the naturally 'spiritual' baby out with the theological bathwater.
People worldwide employ the scientific method or abbreviated versions of it in everyday life to find answers to epic questions like evolution and initial singularity to more modest questions like how a child first learns the best way to tackle a set of stairs. Despite the methods of science being the most reliable and only truly honest system of inquiry, the majority of the human population chooses not to use them for the most crucial question - What's it all about?
Humility is an integral part of our identity. In a society that rewards and celebrates certainty, where confidence masquerades as strength, Mystrikism teaches us to embrace doubt. It reminds us that we are not all-knowing beings; we are deeply flawed and limited in our perception and cognition. To a Mystrik, admitting "I don't know" isn't a weakness but a profound sign of wisdom and strength. It's a virtue that we should all strive to embody.
Mystrikism is a step towards a more thoughtful, ethical, and inclusive society. It's about making positive changes in the way we think and live while working around our imperfections by engaging the methods of science. The Union is a sensible alternative to traditional supernatural religions, and it is a rational identity to align with and to do our best to live by. It is a welcoming community that embraces all who seek a realistic and meaningful approach to life's questions.
Identifying as a Mystrik
A Personal Commitment, But Not a Contract
When you think of "commitment," you might picture car loans, cults, marriage vows, or job contracts - formal agreements that bind you to something with no easy way out. But Mystrikism? It’s a whole different story. It’s not about locking or trapping yourself into something. Instead, it’s a liberating choice. Identifying as a Mystrik is simply a personal decision to live according to a few sensible, rational guiding principles.
-
Our Governing Principle: By accepting imperfection and committing to growth, we learn from mistakes and strive to improve, guiding all other elements as we evolve.
-
Our Prime Directives:
-
Honesty: Striving to think like a scientist by questioning, exploring, and being guided by verifiable evidence or earned trust.
-
Kindness: Doing our best to live by a code of ethics based on measurable well-being for ourselves, other sapient beings, and nature’s ecosystems.
-
Embracing an entirely natural reality with no supernatural elements.
-
Making the time to savour those sublime moments in life that transcend the ordinary, filling us with awe and wonder.
-
Holding profound reverence (respect and awe) for the infinite unknown. The sublime mystery of the cosmos is our higher power, subduing our ego and pride.
There’s no obligation, no pressure. There are NOT and will never be any requirements for money, labour, or obedience to any person - EVER. It’s not a commitment that weighs you down but rather one that lifts you up, giving structure and identity to support you in living your best life, authentically and meaningfully. It’s a dedication to yourself to be the kind and honest person you aspire to be, a unique journey that’s personal to you and you alone.
The Inspiration Behind Mystrikism
Traditional Religions and Their Influence
Despite their apparent irrationality and how they have not evolved in any meaningful way to keep up with societal maturity, it bothers me that traditional supernatural old-world religions, even in Western countries, continue to wield significant influence over laws and politics worldwide. For example, Sharia law governs life in Islamic countries like Saudi Arabia and Iran. In Catholic-majority nations such as Poland and the Philippines, anti-abortion laws reflect religious doctrine. At the same time, LGBTQ+ rights are restricted in Christian-majority countries like Uganda, Russia, and some American states. Blasphemy laws are enforced in countries like Pakistan, Indonesia, and even Ireland, while anti-conversion laws exist in several Hindu-majority Indian states.
In Western politics, religious influence remains strong. Evangelical Christians in the United States play a significant role in elections and policy decisions on education, reproductive rights, and climate change. The Orthodox Church in Russia supports government policies that limit freedom of expression, while Jewish religious parties in Israel shape legislation on marriage and military service. In countries like Italy and Spain, Christian lobbying impacts decisions on euthanasia and stem cell research. Additionally, religious symbols and prayers to supernatural beings persist in government settings, such as "In God We Trust" on American currency and the recitation of prayers in the UK Parliament.
Secular Movements: Challenges and Limitations
The secular and sceptical parts of society are largely underrepresented globally, despite 16% of the global population identifying as non-religious, including non-theists, atheists, agnostics, and secular individuals. Please note that much of this data comes from regions where admitting otherwise is a virtual death sentence. This percentage varies widely by region, with higher rates in some European countries, which can be as high as 50-60%, and lower rates in regions like the Middle East and sub-Saharan Africa.
Unlike religious groups, the secular 'community’ lacks a unified identity. Humanism, while courageously attempting to fill this gap, often needs to catch up due to its flaw of anthropocentricity. In the United States, secular viewpoints are frequently sidelined in political discourse dominated by religious rhetoric. In India, despite a growing number of non-theists, atheists and agnostics, religious influence still heavily sways laws and policies. In the UK, secular voices struggle to gain traction against the established Church of England's influence in government matters. In many parts of Africa and the Middle East, secularists face severe and often brutal repression, further diminishing their visibility and political power.
Without clear cohesion, these disparate individuals and groups struggle to impact the global stage in any meaningful way. One primary reason is that secular groups often lack the "spiritual" dimension that many find compelling in religious communities. Agnostics, by definition, embrace uncertainty about the existence of a governing supernatural entity, which can lead to a sense of existential ambiguity. Atheists, who reject belief in any deity, often focus on what isn't rather than what is, potentially leaving a void where a sense of purpose or transcendence might be. Dedicated sceptics can sometimes come across as almost nihilistic with their relentless questioning, dismissing not just religious claims but also the sense of wonder and meaning that many people seek. Moreover, secular groups, even humanism, typically do not offer a clear system of ethics rooted in shared values. While they advocate for reason, science, and individual rights, they often fail to provide a moral framework that resonates on a personal or communal level.
Without a unifying moral authority or a sense of a rational power greater than ourselves, secular groups struggle to offer the perspective and comfort that many find in religious or "spiritual" communities. This absence of an overarching purpose can leave individuals searching for meaning, which religious and "spiritual" traditions often provide through fantastical cosmic narratives, life after death, or a connection to something eternal. This deficiency makes it challenging for secular movements to inspire the same level of personal investment and community that religious groups enjoy, further contributing to their fragmentation and limited influence in society.
The Intersection of Morality and Science
Another significant reason why people hesitate to rally behind secular causes in large numbers is that morality has historically been viewed as the domain of religious institutions. For centuries, religious teachings provided the primary framework for understanding right and wrong, shaping societal norms and individual behaviour. This association between morality and the divine has made it difficult for secular movements to present a compelling alternative, as many still equate ethical living with religious adherence and divine obedience.
However, this landscape is beginning to shift, thanks partly to thinkers like Sam Harris and others who challenge the long-held belief that morality must be grounded in superstition. Harris, in his book The Moral Landscape, argues that ethics and morality can be rooted in the scientific method, the most reliable and only honest approach to understanding reality. He introduces the idea that well-being can be measured on a spectrum, ranging from abject suffering to optimal flourishing. By applying empirical methods to assess this well-being, we can objectively evaluate the morality of our actions based on their outcomes along this spectrum.
Harris's theories are supported by other prominent thinkers who believe science can provide a solid foundation for morality. Philosopher Peter Singer, for example, advocates for a utilitarian approach to ethics, where the morality of an action is determined by its ability to maximise well-being and reduce suffering. Singer's work, especially in Practical Ethics and The Expanding Circle, emphasises the importance of using reason and evidence to guide our moral decisions. Similarly, Daniel Dennett, in works like Breaking the Spell and Darwin's Dangerous Idea, argues that morality, like other aspects of human culture, has evolved and can be understood through the lens of science. Dennett suggests that moral systems can be analysed and improved using empirical methods, challenging the notion that they must be rooted in religious doctrine.
Mystrikism and the Union offer a cohesive identity and doctrine that blends rational thought, scientific inquiry, and a natural (non-supernatural) "spirituality" as a new alternative. Central to this is our deep reverence for the dynamic and infinite unknown, our rational "higher power" that humbles us while inspiring a lifelong pursuit of discovery. We also find "spiritual" fulfilment in awe, purpose in unveiling the mysteries of the cosmos, and humility in recognising the eternal limits to our understanding. With clear ethics grounded in the philosophy of scientifically measurable well-being, Mystrikism fosters a profound connection to the universe, providing a meaningful, inclusive, and ethically driven path that fills the existential void of standard secularism.
Absence of Evidence is Provisionally Evidence of Absence
Both atheists and non-theists often encounter demands from theists, particularly online, to “prove your position with evidence!” The Oxford English Dictionary defines atheism and non-theism as “the disbelief in the existence of god or gods” and “the lack of belief in a god or gods,” respectively. This underscores the inherent challenge of proving a negative claim. Positive claims, such as “Humpback whales breathe air,” can be substantiated through reliable, objective, verified, reproducible, relevant, trustworthy, empirical or logical, and falsifiable (ROVRRTELF) evidence. Negative claims, like “Leprechauns don’t exist,” cannot be established in the same manner.
To clarify, evidence can only be shown to be ROVRRTELF by employing the only honest (ultimately) and most reliable system of inquiry currently available: the integrated methods of science, primarily the scientific method (SM), with every step thoroughly applied (and reapplied). This introduces a challenging but ultimately surmountable obstacle for addressing negative claims. As said, to confirm something exists, we rely on ROVRRTELF evidence to validate its existence. Conversely, to address a negative claim, we seek the absence of ROVRRTELF evidence, either by failing to find evidence, failing to successfully navigate the SM, demonstrating that the claim itself is unfalsifiable, or all of the above. Proving a negative, conditionally at least, especially for claims with universal implications (e.g. the existence of deities), often requires extensive time and exceptionally thorough investigation. Yet, when exhaustive inquiry over a significant period of time fails to reveal any ROVRRTELF evidence, this persistent absence provides a reasonable basis for a Mystrik to accept provisional non-existence, always subject to future discoveries.
The concept of god(s), like other supernatural ideas, are regarded as unreal or invalid by the Union of Mystriks due to the complete lack of ROVRRTELF evidence, despite millennia of investigation, including the time since the Enlightenment of more intense scrutiny.
The statement “Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence” is not a logical fallacy. However, some argue it aligns with the ‘black swan’ fallacy or the fallacy of ‘arguing from ignorance’ (argumentum ad ignorantiam). However, exceptions to these fallacies clarify its validity in specific contexts. Using terms like “conditional,” “provisional,” and “qualified” resolves perceived conflicts with the black swan fallacy by framing conclusions as tentative rather than definitive and absolute. Similarly, the exception to ‘arguing from ignorance’ fallacy lies in the proportionality of evidence: when evidence should logically exist if a claim were true, its absence becomes meaningful to the point of being sharply obvious.
The ‘argument from Ignorance’ fallacy serves as a caution against prematurely concluding non-existence when evidence might simply be undiscovered due to limited technology, time, methods, scope, or resources. However, its validity is context-dependent. In cases where some evidence should logically and necessarily exist if a claim were true, such as claims of a tiger in a room, or a assertion of such universal scope and paradigm shifting implications, the total absence of ROVRRTELF evidence is significant and proportional, serving as qualified evidence of absence.
It’s important to note that the phrase “Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence” is not an official scientific rule but rather a heuristic, a practical mental shortcut to guide reasoning and decision-making in the face of uncertainty. Yet, when resource-intensive and highly motivated searches consistently fail to uncover ROVRRTELF evidence over long stretches of time, it becomes reasonable to allow ourselves to conditionally conclude that something does not exist. For example, maybe unicorns are not merely hiding; their persistent absence after centuries of investigation strongly suggests they do not exist. Mystriks assert that such reasoning, while not absolute, is a practical approach to distinguishing what is currently real from what is imagined or at the very least, unsupported by evidence.
Mystrikism embraces this scientific approach, acknowledging that concepts currently labelled as superstitious, supernatural, or paranormal could be reclassified as natural if new ROVRRTELF evidence emerges. Historically, phenomena once considered supernatural were found to have natural explanations through scientific inquiry. This potential for reclassification underscores Mystrikism’s commitment to the integrated methods of science, where evidence and reason continually reshape the boundaries between the known and the unknown.
Grounded Values in an AI World
In this new age of AI, trusting what we see and hear has become more complicated than ever. The days of simply being cautious of a smooth-talking salesperson, a charismatic politician, a passionate writer, or a magnetic religious figure are behind us. There was a time when all it took to mislead people was a clever phrase or a movement that promised an escape from the hard work of thinking for ourselves. Now, AI is in the mix, making things even murkier.
It’s like watching a magic trick where AI plays the magician’s assistant, except instead of pulling a rabbit from a hat, they’re putting words into the mouths of people we trust. AI can fabricate images and videos and produce fake evidence, and suddenly, anyone with the right tools can masquerade as the next Shakespeare or at least make us believe it. Blurring the lines between fact and fiction has never been easier, and AI can make it sound pretty convincing, too. Even the least persuasive can now come across as a professional speechwriter.
With the rise of AI, we must insist on principles grounded in verifiable evidence and logical reasoning. We can no longer afford to rely on gut feelings or impressive words alone. In this era, Mystrikism and the MCU offer a solid intellectual and ethical foundation to navigate the confusion. Our prime directives are simple yet essential: kindness and honesty.
Kindness isn’t complicated. It’s about ensuring that we do our best to promote the well-being of ourselves, others, and nature's ecosystems through our actions and words. It’s not some unattainable ideal but a practical way to show respect for all.
On the other hand, honesty requires us to see the world clearly without letting bias, cognitive flaws, assumptions, or wishful thinking distort our view. This is where the methods of science comes into play. It is our most honest and reliable tool for deciphering reality, especially in this AI-driven world of illusions. Trust must be earned, and we build it by being rigorously honest and calm in our thinking.
So, while AI might blur the lines between truth and falsehood, we remain steadfast. This is no time to sit back and let the words of others, real or not, think for us. It’s time to embrace the straightforward power of kindness and honesty, guided by the clarity science provides and the trust it has earned.
Aweism and The Mystery of Existence
Part 1 of 2
In Mystrikism, we embrace Aweism, a concept introduced by sociologist Phil Zuckerman in his book Living the Secular Life: New Answers to Old Questions. It recognises that life and the universe, with all their chaotic beauty, are mysteries too profound to fully understand yet worth celebrating without turning to supernatural explanations.
Aweism is about giving the secrets of reality respect and awe, not gods or higher powers. It’s being moved by the fact that we exist on this strange, wet rock hurtling through space. We don’t need a divine reason for why we’re here; simply recognising that we are here is extraordinary enough. Rather than filling gaps in our knowledge with divine answers, Mystriks learn to patiently sit with the unknown, trusting science to gradually reveal its secrets while offering us purpose and meaning throughout the journey.
Much like standing at the edge of a vast canyon, an empty ocean, or gazing at a starry sky, there’s something humbling about our inability to fully grasp existence. In Mystrikism, we don’t just embrace this, we consciously savour it, immersing ourselves in the wonder of it all.
Aweism isn’t limited to cosmic questions. It’s found in everyday moments: walking through a forest, smelling the earth after rain, or watching the dance of light on a wall. Whether contemplating the dynamic and infinite cosmos or a spider’s web, we’re reminded of the intricate beauty around us.
This mindset contrasts with religious traditions that claim final answers. As Zuckerman explains, religious believers often see awe as proof of a higher power. They interpret the universe’s mysteries as evidence of something supernatural. But in Aweism, those same mysteries are valuable on their own. Just as stars don’t need music to enhance their beauty, the universe doesn’t need a deity to validate its existence.
In Mystrikism, we celebrate awe not by seeking definitive answers but by accepting that some questions will remain open forever. This isn’t a weakness, it’s a strength. It’s intellectual honesty, embracing the limits of human understanding, and finding beauty in those very limits. As Albert Einstein said, “The most beautiful emotion we can experience is the mysterious. It is the fundamental emotion that stands at the cradle of all true art and science.” Aweism captures this: mystery isn’t something to solve, it’s something to savour.
The universe, from galactic clusters to subatomic particles, is an intricate web of the known and unknown. Zuckerman reminds us, “Humanity’s destiny is irreducible unknowingness.” Acknowledging that some things remain beyond our reach isn’t defeat, it’s an invitation to appreciate the beauty of mystery. In Mystrikism, we call this an embrace of Aweism, a joyful acceptance that life’s deepest mysteries give it meaning.
Aweism and The Mystery of Existence
Part 2 of 2
Everyday Examples of Aweism in Action
To give you a sense of how Aweism plays out in everyday life, here are some concrete examples where awe can be found in the ordinary and extraordinary:
The Beauty of Nature: Walking through a forest, seeing the trees sway in the wind, or standing at the edge of the ocean as waves crash against the shore. These are moments when the complexity and beauty of the natural world can fill us with awe. This doesn’t need to be attributed to any divine force, nature alone is astounding enough.
The Vastness of the Cosmos: When we look up at the night sky, seeing the stars, planets, and galaxies, it’s impossible not to feel small. But it’s not a humbling smallness that feels limiting, it’s a vast sense of connection to something much bigger than ourselves. We don’t need to speculate about the origins of the universe; just witnessing its beauty and expanse is enough to inspire awe.
Human Ingenuity and Creativity: The ability of human beings to create art, music, and technology is another source of awe. A painting hanging in a museum, a piece of music that stirs deep emotions, or a scientific breakthrough that transforms lives, all these are testaments to the incredible capacity of the human mind. In Mystrikism, we admire and celebrate these achievements as examples of what humans can accomplish through curiosity, dedication, and creativity.
The Complexity of Life: Everyday biological processes, like a baby being born or the intricate workings of the brain, are deeply awe-inspiring when you consider the science behind them. Life itself is an extraordinary process, and whether it’s the birth of a child or the growth of a single cell, there’s awe to be found in the very structure of living organisms.
Quiet Moments: Sometimes, it’s in the stillness of a moment, watching sunlight filter through a window or feeling the rain on your face, that awe can strike. These moments remind us that we don’t need grand or monumental experiences to feel awe. It can be found in the simplicity of just being present and aware of the world around us.
A Child’s Perspective: One of the most profound ways we can experience awe is through the eyes of a child. Children often see the world as if everything is brand new to them, because it is. Their wonder and curiosity remind us to look at the world with fresh eyes, to question, explore, and celebrate the mystery of life. Whether it’s watching a child’s fascination with stars or their first steps, it’s a powerful reminder that awe is a natural and essential part of life.
These examples highlight the essence of Aweism, finding profound wonder in both the smallest and the largest aspects of life, without turning to supernatural explanations. We revel in the mystery, not because we expect it to be solved, but because it is a part of what makes life so magnificently awe-inspiring. We accept that we may never know all the answers, and that’s where the beauty lies.
The Stages of Belief and Non-Belief
This chart breaks down some of the many kinds of beliefs and non-belief. Some are deeply theistic, and others lean sceptical or utterly secular. Sometimes, with only barely discernable differences. For some, subtly is often important in these matters of identity. For Mystrikism, a few types are our natural home - the most prominent being non-theism:
-
Non-Theism: This is a no-brainer for Mystrikism. It moves beyond gods entirely, focusing instead on naturalism, ethics, and what can be proven. It keeps us open and leaves room for human growth and a scientific way of thinking.
-
Cosmic Skeptic: This one’s all about embracing the beauty and mystery of the universe while rejecting supernatural explanations. It’s perfect for finding "spirituality" in the natural world, just like Mystrikism.
-
Ethical Skeptic: A strong fit because it focuses on morality rooted in reason and compassion rather than divine authority or cultural dogma. It aligns with Mystrikism’s kindness and rational ethics.
-
Freethought: A great match for its emphasis on intellectual independence, questioning traditions, and relying on evidence and reason. It champions open-minded inquiry, which is central to Mystrikism.
-
Mystical Skeptic: This type balances scepticism with awe and wonder about the world. It’s great for those who feel "spiritual" in natural ways but question the supernatural.
-
Secular Skeptic: Broad and uncompromising, it challenges all unsupported claims, religious, pseudoscientific, or otherwise, and sticks to evidence and logic. Its scepticism is applied universally, which resonates with Mystrikism’s honesty.
"Spirituality" Was Stolen - We’re Stealing It Back
Mystrikism’s use of “spirituality” often raises eyebrows, with critics questioning whether a philosophy rooted in naturalism, rationality, and non-theism should even use a word so intertwined with organised superstitions. But for us, reclaiming “spirituality” is about reclaiming what was always human and natural, long before religion wrapped it in supernatural labels and explanations.
Why “Spirituality” Matters to Us
The essence of Mystrikism’s secular “spirituality” lies in celebrating profound, awe-inspiring moments that deeply connect us to reality without invoking the supernatural. Imagine standing beneath a sprawling night sky, marvelling at our Milky Way galaxy and the vastness of the universe, experiencing a stirring symphony that ineffably resonates with you or sharing a moving moment of genuine friendship and connection. These experiences are visceral and profound, transcending the ordinary and evoking a “spiritual” reaction. Scientific or rational explanations behind these feelings, where they exist, don’t lessen them; they elevate them. Our brains and nervous systems, built to respond to awe, natural beauty, and connection, allow us to feel these moments with extraordinary intensity, making them entirely real.
Why Not Use Other Words?
Terms like “connective,” “transformative,” or even “profound” have been suggested as alternatives. But let’s be honest: none of these words encapsulate the depth of these universal experiences we’re talking about. These words fall short in scope and emotional resonance. “Spirituality” carries a history and emotional weight that make it unique. It’s universally understood to point toward something deeply felt, even if it’s been misappropriated to serve religious and mystical narratives.
“Spirituality” Wasn’t Always Theological
The idea that “spirituality” is only tied to religion is relatively recent. Long before organised religion formalised it, humans felt awe at the natural world, reverence toward the unknown, and wonder at life’s mysteries. Religious institutions may have borrowed and rebranded these sensations as divine or paranormal, but they were originally part of the default human experience. We’re simply reclaiming this language for what it has always been: a universal descriptor of feelings that transcend daily life and are grounded in the real, observable universe.
Words That Made the Journey from Spiritual to Secular
History is full of English words that started with theological roots and have since become secularised or even scientific. Here are just a few:
-
Inspiration – Originally from the Latin inspirare, meaning “to breathe into,” this word referred to divine guidance or wisdom imparted in religious contexts, such as in the Bible, where prophets were "inspired" by God to speak or write sacred truths. This idea of being "breathed into" by a higher power held for centuries before shifting, particularly during the Renaissance, to mean a spark of creativity or insight that artists, scientists, and thinkers could experience independently of divine influence. Today, it’s universally understood as a spark of creativity or motivation. Artists, scientists, and inventors all speak of feeling “inspired,” a term now secular in scope and meaning.
-
Enlightenment – This word once referred solely to spiritual awakening or divine insight. It stems from the Old English inlihtan, meaning “to illuminate” or “to shed light on.” Historically, enlightenment referred expressly to spiritual awakening in Buddhism, describing a state of profound insight and liberation attained by figures like the Buddha. This deeply spiritual meaning held for centuries before the term expanded in the 18th century to represent a broad intellectual movement in Europe focused on reason, science, and secular progress. Today, it’s a beacon of rational thought, reason, and scientific discovery.
-
Genius – In ancient Rome, genius referred to a spirit or guardian deity assigned to every person. The term originates from the Latin genius, meaning a protective spirit assigned to each person at birth to guide and inspire their talents. By the Renaissance, the term evolved to describe an exceptional natural talent, especially in the arts or sciences, shifting from an external spirit to an innate personal brilliance. Today, genius denotes extraordinary intellectual or creative ability without any religious undertone.
-
Ecstasy – Originally, ecstasy was associated with mystical experiences or divine rapture, often depicting someone “taken out” of themselves to commune with the divine. The word comes from the Greek ekstasis, meaning “standing outside oneself." It describes a trance-like state of being lifted beyond ordinary experience. In religious contexts, it was understood as a state of spiritual rapture. Over time, ecstasy broadened to denote an intense feeling of joy or overwhelming pleasure, shedding its mystical connotations to describe any extreme emotional high.
-
Blessing – The word blessing originates from the Old English blētsian or blētsung, initially meaning “to mark with blood” in ritual sacrifices intended to gain favour from gods. With the spread of Christianity, a blessing came to mean divine favour or sanctification, invoking God’s grace upon people, places, or events. Over centuries, it secularised to signify any form of good fortune, approval, or benefit, now encompassing feelings of gratitude or expressions of good wishes without religious implication.
The secularisation of these terms mirrors our approach to “spirituality.” Once connected to supernatural or mystical origins, they now express natural, human, and intellectual qualities. Just as genius and inspiration evolved, so too can “spirituality” align with a naturalistic worldview.
A Brief History of the Term “Spirituality”
The word spirit originally meant “breath” in Latin, symbolising life’s essence rather than any religious entity. Over time, it became associated with the soul in religious texts, and spirituality grew to imply a divine or supernatural connection. Yet, at its core, “spirituality” has always referred to something profoundly moving, qualities that universally resonate, regardless of beliefs.
As no credible evidence supports the existence of a literal spirit or soul, we view “spirituality” as a metaphor for the emergent functions of the human brain and nervous system. Awe under a vast night sky, curiosity that fuels discovery, and unity in community gatherings are entirely natural, “spiritual” experiences. They need no gods or supernatural realms, only an open heart and mind ready to embrace life’s wonders.
Reclaiming “Spirituality” as Our Own
Within Mystrikism, we believe that “spirituality” is a bridge to these universal experiences, not something owned by any one ideology or belief system. We’re taking back this language to reflect a rational awe, a secular reverence, and a grounded connection to reality. Let “spirituality” serve as a reminder that some of life’s most moving experiences lie within the universe as it is: vast, complex, and endlessly inspiring. So, yes, we’re stealing “spirituality” back because it was always ours to begin with.
Is it the Absence of Belief or the Belief in Absence?
Unbelievers are often held at “Bible-point,” accused of actively asserting the non-existence of gods rather than simply lacking belief. Mystriks hold that this distinction ultimately doesn’t matter. While many sceptics view non-theism and atheism as having no obligation to prove anything, Mystriks argue that we have a scientific responsibility to highlight the absence of evidence as a meaningful form of evidence in its own right. Believers themselves have desperately searched for proof of gods and the supernatural for millennia, yet not a single sub-atomic particle of verified or falsifiable evidence has ever been produced. This consistent lack of supporting proof grounds the non-theistic position as the most rational yet qualified conclusion at this time.
The historical case of the luminiferous ether is an ideal example, from an abundance of choice, of how a lack of substantiation leads to rejecting claims. In the 19th century, the ether was hypothesised as the medium through which light travelled, akin to sound waves travelling through air. The Michelson-Morley experiment (1887) sought to detect the Earth’s movement through the ether but found no measurable evidence of its existence. Despite initial opposition by its proponents, the consistent failure to detect the ether ultimately led to its rejection, further reinforced by Einstein’s theory of relativity, which showed that light requires no medium to propagate.
This example highlights a key principle: claims without evidence, particularly when evidence should be detectable, fail to meet the burden of proof. This isn’t about asserting the non-existence of the ether but acknowledging that the claim lacked support. The same applies to theistic claims, which remain unproven despite aeons of scrutiny. How non-theism or atheism is framed is fundamentally irrelevant. It’s a purely semantic and futile debate, which should be left at the steps of the Orphanage for Fruitless Debates along with the 'free will' controversy. Without evidence, non-belief is the only rational stance. Like the ether, the absence of evidence for gods is provisionally treated as evidence of absence until proven otherwise.
Belief, defined as “acceptance that something exists or is true,” relies on being in alignment with facts, ideas that can be demonstrably proven through observation and or argument. When a proposition lacks empirical or logical corroboration after an exhaustive, protracted, and highly motivated investigation, it is safe to, at the very least, conditionally regard it as unproven and unjustified. In Mystrikism, this conclusion and all other intellectual positions remain open to new evidence, embodying scientific honesty and being oriented with the methods of science.
Emergentism in Mystrikism
Mystrikism approaches emergent phenomena and emergentism with a grounded, naturalistic perspective, rejecting supernatural explanations. Emergent properties arise from the interaction of simpler components, producing outcomes that appear “greater than the sum of their parts.” However, Mystrikism considers this perception as a reflection of the gaps in human understanding rather than evidence of irreducibility.
Emergentism as a Provisional Concept
In Mystrikism, emergent is a practical yet ultimately temporary appellation that describes phenomena not yet fully understood. It serves as a placeholder, acknowledging the complexity of systems like consciousness or ecosystems without claiming they are fundamentally beyond a reductionist explanation. For example, consciousness is considered an emergent property of neural activity that can, in principle, be fully explained once all underlying mechanisms are identified.
Mystrikism holds that emergent phenomena are not inherently mysterious or irreducible but represent challenges for future scientific exploration. With time and scientific investigation, what seems “greater than the sum of its parts” will be revealed as the product of identifiable components and processes.
Rejection of Ontological Emergentism
Mystrikism rejects ontological emergentism, the view that emergent properties represent fundamentally new realities that cannot be reduced to their constituent parts. This perspective is incompatible with Mystrikism’s commitment to a naturalistic and explainable universe governed entirely by physical laws.
Alignment with Epistemological Emergentism
Instead, Mystrikism aligns with epistemological emergentism, which acknowledges that emergent phenomena often appear irreducible due to current cognitive, technological, or methodological limitations. This position recognises emergent terms as practical descriptors, guiding understanding until scientific advancements uncover the complete underlying mechanisms.
Emergentism in Practice
Mystrikism embraces the label emergent as an essential tool for describing large-scale, highly complex systems. While rejecting the speculative aspects of ontological emergentism, such as the metaphysical implications of irreducibility, including mystical or dualistic explanations, Mystrikism retains the logical utility of this expression for navigating and framing intricate phenomena like consciousness or ecosystems.
Discarding speculative claims while preserving the practical value of emergent as a descriptive term, Mystrikism strikes a balance between expansive perspective and rational inquiry. It celebrates the natural world’s complexity while maintaining trust in the scientific process to reveal its deeper truths.
