BASIC
ELEMENTS
About Us (Expanded)
Mystrikism is a sensible, syncretic, philosophical framework that offers a rational alternative to traditional religion. We aim to provide a naturalistic identity that values critical thought, scientific inquiry, and ethical tenets based on empirically measurable well-being without the need for unsubstantiated supernatural elements.
Syncretic refers to the blending of ideas, beliefs, and practices from diverse sources into a cohesive whole. It aims to draw the best from all worlds, incorporating any viable, rational, and useful insights. Rather than merging ideas indiscriminately, our approach carefully selects elements from human philosophy, culture, and even some rational aspects of theological thought, creating a balanced and thoughtful synthesis.
Mystrikism addresses the need for common ground among sceptical individuals, enhancing, complementing and building upon humanism. It offers a framework of objective ethics rooted in quantifiable flourishing for all life and ecologies, a rational concept greater than ourselves, and a naturalised "spirituality" that celebrates those moments in life that transcend the ordinary.
The purpose of Mystrikism, ultimately, is to encourage sapient beings to explore and uncover the mysteries of the universe, to marvel at its sublimity and complexity, and to expand our knowledge and wisdom.
Of course, no one is expected to become a scientist by profession, but we encourage Mystriks to do their best to think like one, carefully and honestly unravelling the truth around us. Each of us uncovers the universe’s secrets in our own way, whether through exploring the macro and micro cosmos, investigating nature and its governing laws, examining our inner selves, and learning the value of kindness.
Mystriks believe that the noblest goals are the honest pursuit of the best approximate truth, the appreciation of reality’s splendour, and the employment of compassion. Thus kindness and the methods of science, are central to our ethos. The Union upholds that kindness infuses warmth and sustainability into the lifeless realms of cold logic and reason.
Why should we write “no religion” or merely “agnostic” or “atheist” on a census form when we embody so much more? We find marvel and sublimity in the world like any other intelligent beings, except we don’t attribute these experiences to any supernatural interpretation.
We revere, simply meaning respect and awe, the dynamic and infinite unknown as a rational aspect of reality eternally beyond our scope, giving perspective to our self-importance, humbling egotism and subduing hubris. This reverence is not worship, nor does it involve any form of devotion or supernatural belief. It’s a recognition of the vast mystery without assigning it divine attributes. By definition, the mystery of reality is beyond our understanding, epically greater than ourselves, and not in conflict with logic and the purposes of science. This concept has no mind, agency, personality, agenda, awareness, or any divine, paranormal, or supernatural elements. Though some forms of pantheism or pandeism interpret the unknown as a manifestation of a god or divine force, Mystrikism firmly separates itself from such beliefs.
Mystriks train themselves to deliberately pause and savour those naturalised (non-supernatural) “spiritual" moments of awe, wonder and connection that transcend the ordinary. That inspired feeling you receive from your brain and nervous system when you look at our Milky Way galaxy, seeing the delicate beauty of a dewy spider’s web, learn an important truth or hear a perfect piece of music.
Mystriks acknowledge the limits of human knowledge, perception, memory and cognition, relying on the integrated methods of science to compensate for our flaws in our attempts to comprehend reality. Mystrikism integrates the philosophy of naturalism, emphasising that the universe’s complexity and beauty are sufficient without supernatural explanations, recognising a reality exclusively based on natural elements and leaving no room for the paranormal.
So far, like other superstitions, the god hypothesis has not been scientifically verified, nor is it even falsifiable. As a result, our agnosticism leads us to non-theism: because we don’t know, we don’t believe. Many forms of atheism often involve an outright and active rejection of theistic claims, which can create a sense of finality. Non-theism, on the other hand, leaves more room for humility and inquiry. It simply indicates the absence of belief in gods without requiring an absolute and definitive stance. For Mystrikism, non-religious non-theism better aligns with our core values of naturalism, the scientific method, and openness to the unknown. In this way, we remain grounded in reality while staying open to the mysteries of the cosmos.
We invite those seeking a like-minded identity and sensible values to live by. If you have any interest, please explore our website to fully grasp what we represent. For ANY questions or more details, feel free to email us ANYTIME. If our philosophy resonates with you and you wish to identify as a Mystrik and live by our principles, we invite you to drop us a line, and we will contact you.
mystrikism@pm.me
+61 402 760 705
What does a Mystrik believe?
Living Mystrikism - A Journey of Kindness, Inquiry, and Awe
As a Mystrik, the essence of our beliefs is woven from the fabric of kindness, the rigour of the scientific method, and a wonder-inspired view of the universe we term Aweism. These are not mere philosophical stances but lived experiences that shape every aspect of our lives and interactions with the world.
The Foundation of Kindness:
Kindness is the cornerstone of our interactions, guiding us to approach each other and the world with empathy, compassion, and understanding. It partners and integrates with rationality, embedding warmth into the cold logic that often defines pure logic reason. This principle fosters a community where social harmony, scientific discovery and personal growth are not just ideals but realities we strive for daily.
Upholding Scientific Inquiry:
Our commitment to the scientific method is a testament to our pursuit of truth. It equips us to navigate the complexities of existence with a critical eye, embracing evidence over superstition and fostering a culture where beliefs are challenged and refined. This approach has led us to adopt agnostic non-theism, recognising the limits of human knowledge while remaining open to the vast sublime unknown.
Embracing Aweism:
Aweism, the naturalised "spirituality" we advocate, celebrates the profound beauty and mystery of the universe without invoking the paranormal and supernatural. It is in the grandeur of the cosmos, the intricacy of natural phenomena, and the depth of human connection that we find "spiritual" fulfilment. This perspective enriches our lives, providing a sense of humility and belonging to something greater than ourselves, rooted in the real and the tangible.
In embodying these principles, we, the Union of Mystriks, offer a sanctuary for those seeking to blend intellectual curiosity with "spiritual" depth. Our journey is one of continuous learning, ethical living, and a celebration of the natural world, guided by kindness, driven by inquiry, and inspired by marvel and awe.
Why the cosmic snail as our symbol?
The snail, a gentle earthly creature, signifies our devotion to naturalism and our pledge to remain grounded in a reality that is observed, felt, and scientifically understood.
In the fable of the Tortoise and the Hare, the slow-moving creature triumphs through steady, unwavering determination. Similarly, our path is one of persistent inquiry, not swayed by the swift allure of unproven beliefs but fortified by steady, rational thought.
Our icon's spiral shell echoes the profound patterns that dance through nature and the universe - from the grand spirals of galaxies to the delicate curves of seashells, from the twirling forces within weather systems to the dynamic swirl of water draining. This spiral connects us to the universe's omnipresent patterns, representing the unending cycle of growth and evolution.
Look closely, and you’ll notice the optimistic tilt of the snail's head, a subtle embodiment of our positive outlook and curiosity. The snail's antennae, its investigative sensors, reach out to the world with eagerness, symbolising our community's quest for truth and discovery.
Our icon is a testament to our belief system: a snail, grounded yet guided by the stars, inspires us to explore the majestic tapestry of existence with optimism, curiosity, and a profound respect for the rational and the awe-inspiring alike.
Why the name?
"Mystrikism" is a portmanteau, a blend of two words into one, in this case combining "Mystery" with "Metric," representing a unique juxtaposition to our worldview. While "mystery" suggests the unknown, ineffable, or unexplainable, "metric" denotes measurement, quantification, and logical methods of understanding. Thus, "Mystrikism" signifies an endeavour to apply measurable and analytical methods to uncover the unknown aspects of reality while holding in reverence the profound mystery for what remains yet to be discovered.
Pronunciation:
Mystrikism (noun)
[mis-trick-izm]
The philosophy and doctrine.
Mystrikal (adjective)
[mis-trick-uhl]
Like Mystical but with an extra ‘r’.
A Mystrik (noun)
[mis-trick]
A Member of the Union of Mystriks.
Why are we Aweistic?
Aweism is a concept introduced by sociologist Phil Zuckerman in his book "Living the Secular Life: New Answers to Old Questions."
It represents a profound, non-supernatural sense of existential wonder and appreciation that Zuckerman (and Mystriks) believes connects secular individuals, like non-theists, atheists, humanists, agnostics, and others, to the universe and each other. Zuckerman describes it as a "profound, overflowing feeling" experienced in moments of intense personal significance, such as spending time with family or enjoying nature. He considers it akin to a naturalised "spirituality" grounded in the world and not linked to theological beliefs.
Zuckerman's concept of aweism addresses the misconception that secular people lack purpose, meaning, or emotional depth. He argues that lay individuals can experience awe without needing supernatural explanations, embracing the mystery and beauty of life without requiring a divine context. This concept is an attempt to unite various factions of nonbelief and offer a positive, optimistic identity beyond simply rejecting religious belief.
Experiences considered "aweistic" generally involve profound connection, wonder, or appreciation, often arising from everyday occurrences or natural phenomena. These are experiences that evoke a deep sense of marvel or amazement, transcending ordinary life. They can be intensely personal and vary widely from person to person. Some examples include:
1. Nature's Grandeur: Witnessing a breathtaking sunset, a star-filled sky, a thunderstorm, or the serene beauty of a forest.
2. Artistic and Cultural Experiences: Being deeply moved by music, art, literature, or a performance that resonates personally.
3. Scientific Revelations: Experiencing awe at the vastness of the universe, the complexity of life, or a scientific breakthrough.
4. Human Connections: Profound bonding moments, like the birth of a child, a wedding, or reuniting with a loved one after a long separation.
5. Acts of Kindness and Humanitarian Achievements: Observing or participating in acts of compassion, bravery, or altruism that highlight the best of humanity.
6. Historical or Architectural Marvels: Standing before ancient ruins, historic landmarks, or architectural wonders that connect one to the past or the feats of human ingenuity.
7. Personal Achievements and Milestones: Achieving a personal goal, overcoming a significant challenge, or reaching a major life milestone.
8. Moments of Solitude and Reflection: Times of quiet introspection or meditation, where one feels a deep sense of peace and connection to the self or the world.
These experiences are characterised by their ability to evoke a sense of awe and wonder, often leading to a deeper appreciation of life, the universe, or the human experience without necessarily invoking supernatural elements.
Why is kindness crucial to Mystricism?
Kindness, often perceived as a moral attribute driven by emotion, is, in fact, deeply rooted in rationality and logic. Simultaneously, it possesses an intrinsic value that extends beyond rational justification.
Kindness's role in promoting social harmony and trust underscores its logical foundation. Sociologically, kind behaviour is pivotal for building strong, cohesive communities. Studies consistently show that altruism leads to more stable social environments, making kindness a rational strategy for societal harmony.
Kindness brings warmth, humanity, and sustainability, softening the sharp edges of pure logic and stark reason that can be cold and harsh without its gentle influence. It serves as a crucial counterbalance, preventing the descent down inhumane pathways of thought and action. In the absence of this essential principle, ideas such as eugenics, research into offensive military technology, and animal testing, among others, can flourish unchecked.
The principle of reciprocity provides another logical basis for kindness. This foundational aspect of human interactions suggests that kind behaviour often leads to positive responses, establishing a cycle of compassion and support. Far from being merely moral or emotional, this reciprocal nature of kindness is a logical, sustainable approach to positive social exchange.
Evolutionary biology further supports the rationality of kindness. Traits like empathy and cooperation have been vital to human development, suggesting that kindness transcends moral choice and becomes a strategic tool for survival and progress.
The emotional and psychological impacts of kindness, such as improved mood, reduced stress, and enhanced well-being, underscore its intrinsic value. These benefits extend beyond the logical advantages of social harmony, highlighting the human capacity for compassion and the essential nature of kindness for a meaningful life.
Kindness also contributes to personal character development and societal values, fostering humility and empathy. It is a universal language, bridging cultural and social divides and promoting global understanding and peace. In a world often divided, kindness emerges as a unifying force, demonstrating its unique intrinsic value.
Adopting a balanced approach to kindness involves recognising its rational and intrinsic aspects. Integrating kindness into daily decisions promotes a logical basis for compassionate behaviour while nurturing its inherent value as an expression of our humanity.
Incorporating kindness into personal and professional realms can be transformative. In personal relationships, it deepens bonds, and in professional settings, it fosters a culture of respect and collaboration. Kindness catalyses positive change, showcasing its versatility as a rational and intrinsically valuable virtue.
Kindness is a multifaceted attribute that encompasses both reason and intrinsic worth. Its rational aspects - promoting social harmony and having evolutionary advantages - position it as a logical choice. At the same time, its inherent value enriches human experiences, fostering personal growth and global harmony. Embracing kindness entirely means acknowledging its logical underpinnings while celebrating its intrinsic virtue. In doing so, we contribute to a more harmonious society and embrace the rewarding experience of our shared humanity. Kindness is not just a rational choice but a necessity, a virtue that enriches our existence, underscoring its indispensable role in human life.
Why do we uphold the Scientific Method?
The Union of Mystriks firmly upholds the scientific method, intertwined with the philosophies of verificationism and falsificationism, as its guiding principle for discerning truth about the universe. This steadfast commitment is rooted in recognising inherent human fallibilities, such as errors in perception, the sway of ego and pride, cognitive biases, and the vulnerability to persuasive language—that can obscure our quest for understanding.
Addressing Human Fallibility: Human cognition is prone to errors, influenced heavily by personal biases, desires, and the compelling nature of persuasive narratives. With its structured approach to inquiry through observation, experimentation, and analysis, the scientific method offers a systematic way to navigate these pitfalls. By demanding empirical evidence and reproducible results, it minimises the impact of individual biases and subjective interpretations, aiming for a more objective truth.
Verificationism and Falsificationism as Pillars of Inquiry: Verificationism asserts that statements must be directly verifiable through empirical observation to hold meaning and encourage a direct engagement with the material world. This engagement ensures that the theories and claims within the Union are not just speculative but are anchored in observable phenomena. Falsificationism, on the other hand, emphasises the importance of being able to refute hypotheses through testing. This principle is crucial for maintaining intellectual integrity, as it accepts the provisional nature of knowledge, understanding that all conclusions are subject to challenge and change with new evidence.
Embracing Intellectual Honesty: By integrating these philosophical approaches, the Union fosters an environment where intellectual honesty prevails over the comfort of unwarranted certainty. This methodology accepts the limitations of human knowledge and the ever-present possibility of being wrong, valuing the journey of inquiry over the destination of supposed absolute truths. It’s a humble acknowledgment that understanding is constantly evolving, and so must the beliefs and doctrines of the community.
Adapting to New Insights: The dynamic nature of the scientific method, combined with the principles of verificationism and falsificationism, ensures that the Union remains open and adaptable to new insights. This adaptability is crucial in a rapidly changing world where scientific discoveries continuously reshape our understanding of the universe. It signifies a commitment to growth, learning, and the evolution of thought, free from the constraints of dogma and doctrinaire thinking.
The Union’s endorsement of the scientific method, verificationism, and falsificationism reflects a profound commitment to exploring the universe with rigour, openness, and an honest acknowledgment of our limitations. This approach not only guides the community in a quest for empirical truth but also embodies a philosophical stance that values intellectual humility, the readiness to adapt beliefs, and the pursuit of understanding free from the distortions of ego, bias, and unsubstantiated claims. Through this lens, the Union seeks to comprehend the vast, intricate, and beautiful complexities of our universe.
.webp)
The Naturalism of Mystrikism
Mystrikism is rooted in a naturalistic worldview, emphasising that the universe and everything within it can be understood through natural laws and phenomena without resorting to supernatural explanations. The Union of Mystriks rejects paranormal elements, advocating for an understanding of the world based solely on what can be observed and tested scientifically.
Explanation of Naturalism
The philosophy of naturalism posits that only natural laws and forces operate in the universe, excluding superstition in all its forms. This viewpoint maintains that natural laws govern the universe’s structure and behaviour and are ultimately discoverable through science and empirical inquiry.
Naturalism holds that nature—composed of physical substances and fundamental properties like mass, energy, and space-time—encompasses all of existence. In this view, concepts such as mathematical objects and information are seen as abstract representations of physical reality, while consciousness, thoughts, and ideas are regarded as emergent properties of physical processes in the brain and body. In Mystrikism, "emergent" refers to something that seems "greater than the sum of its parts," with the key distinction being the emphasis on "seems." To a Mystrik, "emergent" serves as a placeholder term for cases where all the elements and processes within a concept remain unidentified or not yet fully understood.
While these concepts may seem non-physical, they are understood as abstract representations or patterns that arise from the workings of the natural world, not as entities existing independently in a metaphysical realm. This philosophy rejects the paranormal, maintaining that everything is eventually explicable by natural laws and the methods of science. Richard Dawkins succinctly said, "The universe we observe has precisely the properties we should expect if there is, at bottom, no design, no purpose, no evil, no good, nothing but blind, pitiless indifference.”
Metaphysical Naturalism?
Mystrikism aligns closely with metaphysical naturalism, which asserts that everything that exists is natural, with no supernatural elements. While 'metaphysical' might suggest something beyond the physical, here it means viewing all of reality as entirely natural. This is different from methodological naturalism, the approach used in science, where researchers assume natural causes to study the world but without necessarily making claims about what reality ultimately is. On the other hand, metaphysical naturalism is a broader belief that everything in existence is part of the natural world.
The Union acknowledges that concepts currently classified as supernatural, paranormal, or superstitious could shift into the realm of the natural if repeatable, verifiable, and falsifiable empirical evidence emerges. Historically, phenomena once attributed to supernatural forces have been reclassified as natural as scientific inquiry uncovered their underlying mechanisms. This potential for reclassification underscores Mystrikism's commitment to the scientific method and naturalism, where the line between the unknown and the known is continuously shaped by evidence and rational exploration.
This alignment is evident in its rejection of the supernatural, its emphasis on the scientific method, and its focus on natural (non-supernatural) "spirituality". Mystrikism promotes "spiritual" experiences rooted only in natural phenomena and the awesome unknown, savouring moments that transcend the ordinary, inspired by the natural world rather than superstition. This approach values honesty and promotes a profound appreciation for the universe's sublimity and complexity.
While primarily metaphysically naturalistic, Mystrikism also incorporates elements of humanistic and ethical naturalism. It advocates for kindness and cooperation, integrating scientific understanding with human values. This ethical stance is grounded in empirical research from a broad range of scientific disciplines, which helps us understand human and ecological well-being - and develop natural and humane moral values. The ethical stance of Mystrikism, which promotes kindness and honesty above all, reflects the idea that moral values can be derived from human nature and measurable values along the spectrum of well-being, from the depths of the worst imaginable suffering to the heights of possible flourishing fulfilment.
Balancing Rationality and Wonder
Some may fear that strict adherence to naturalism could diminish life's wonder and mystery, but Mystrikism addresses this concern by embracing "Aweism." This concept holds that naturalised "spirituality," a sense of awe and wonder derived from moments that transcend the ordinary, can coexist with rationality. Life’s inexplicable and intricate patterns are not merely subjects of scientific study but are treasured glimpses into the sublime unknown. These mysteries remind us of the splendour of reality that Mystriks celebrate with humility and curiosity.
Thus, Mystrikism teaches that by appreciating the natural world and its revealed and unexplored secrets, we can enrich our "spiritual" experiences and ethical understanding. It underscores that we are not separate from the natural world but an integral part of it, cultivating a deep connection and responsibility towards our environment, fellow sapient beings, and nature’s ecosystems. This naturalistic framework provides a robust foundation for living ethically and appreciating the wonders of the universe without relying on supernatural explanations.
Why are we Agnostic Non-Theists?
Exploring the complexities of reality, questions of belief, knowledge, and the supernatural have long captivated human thought. Mystrikism’s adoption of a naturalistic, agnostic, non-religious, non-theism stems from its commitment to empirical evidence, logical consistency, and the scientific method. Our position reflects an understanding of the limitations of human knowledge, particularly concerning claims about god(s). We navigate the tension between reason and speculation, seeking truth through a disciplined and rational framework.
It's important to clarify why we use the term "non-religious". Some forms of non-theism, such as certain branches of Buddhism, are generally considered religious.
While atheism often involves actively rejecting the existence of gods, non-theism embodies a more thoughtful and conditional absence of belief (or conditional belief in absence, if you prefer) without asserting absolute claims. This less confrontational stance aligns with Mystrikism’s values of humility and scientific openness to the unknown.
The distinctions between 'a-' and 'non-' are generally accepted truths within academic circles, particularly among linguists familiar with English morphology and etymology. In tone and specificity, 'a-' often implies a complete absence or negation (e.g., "apathetic" means entirely lacking emotion or interest). In contrast, 'non-' suggests something is "not" or "outside of" a category or lacking a quality without necessarily implying unqualified negation (e.g., "nonsmoking" refers to the absence of smoking in a space, but it doesn’t negate the possibility of smoking elsewhere).
It could be argued that non-theism closely resembles weak atheism, as both reject active belief in gods while acknowledging the provisional nature of that conclusion. However, the term "weak atheism" can carry unintended yet undermining connotations of insufficiency. Non-theism, as embraced by Mystrikism, is a more precise term, reflecting not just an absence of belief in gods but a thoughtful, open approach.
By embracing non-theism, we prioritise naturalism and inquiry over theological debate, encouraging intellectual flexibility and a more adaptive perspective and approach to the universe's mysteries.
The Foundations – Verificationism & Falsificationism
Building on this framework, our agnosticism acknowledges epistemic limitations, recognising that a lack of empirical evidence and irrefutable logic constrains human knowledge about the divine and paranormal. According to the principle of verificationism, for a claim to be meaningful, it must be successfully verified via the full employment of the scientific method. However, claims about gods or supernatural phenomena fail this criterion, remaining pure speculation. Thus, our agnosticism is not tentative but a reasoned conclusion based on available evidence.
The Union extends this scepticism further, grounded in the scientific principle of falsificationism. Falsificationism argues that for a claim to be considered scientifically valid, to be even called a hypothesis, it must be inherently falsifiable; that is, it must be possible to conceive of an observation, argument or test that could disprove the assertion. Religious concepts, by their nature, evade falsification due to their claims of omnipotence or omnipresence. They are framed in ways that make them immune to empirical testing and refutation, existing beyond observable and measurable phenomena. This approach relegates untestable ideas to unproven propositions at best and meaningless fantasies at worst. Scientists often dismiss such submissions as "not even wrong," referring to untestable ideas that cannot be meaningfully discussed within a scientific framework.
As a result, these conclusions naturally lead us to non-theism. Despite millennia of effort, the god premise has never been scientifically verified, nor can it be subjected to scientific falsification. The universal scope, paradigm-shifting nature, and profound life-changing implications of this idea especially demand our strict adherence to the integrated methods of science. This stance is not merely a procedural preference but a fundamental imperative, born of the recognition that claims about supernatural entities or paranormal forces have profound and far-reaching ramifications for our understanding of the universe, our place within it, and the nature of reality itself. As such, our agnosticism, paired with naturalism, leads us to non-theism: because we don’t know, we don’t believe.
A Stance of Skeptical Openness
Finally, aligning with non-theism articulates a rational perspective without actively seeking debate. Mystrikism, as a philosophical and “spiritual” framework, approaches existence's profound questions with a balance of scepticism and openness. While individual journeys may differ, we value navigating these questions with the scientific method, empirical evidence, and logical consistency. In this way, non-theism is not an endpoint but an ongoing dialogue with the cosmos, a testament to humanity’s quest for knowledge and the humility to acknowledge the limits of our understanding.
Why do Mystriks revere the Unknown?
The Union of Mystrik's reverence for the unknown is a rich and multifaceted belief deeply grounded in human history and psychology. It reflects a mature and considered view of the world and its mysteries. The unknown is our higher "power", which irresistibly compels humility, respect and awe.
From the dawn of humanity, our ancestors were confronted with the ubiquitous unknown, evoking feelings of uncertainty and terror. Their initial response of dread led to the creation of supernatural explanations for what they could not understand. They invented concepts of an afterlife, "spirits" and deities to explain natural phenomena, providing a sense of control and understanding, albeit a hollow artificial one.
As humans evolved, however, so did their approach to the unknown. The progression from fear and superstition to a more rational and scientific understanding marked a significant shift in human consciousness. This journey, characterised by expanding knowledge through trial and error and ultimately refined into the scientific method, did not eliminate the unknown or even its scope but changed our relationship with it.
The Union, in its philosophy, acknowledges this evolution. Mystriks believe that the initial emotional reactions of our ancestors were understandable, but that humanity has matured since then. Instead of fear and terror, reverence is considered the more appropriate response. This reverence is not a supernatural concept but a deep, complex emotion that combines wonder, awe, and respect. It is a recognition that there are aspects of the universe grander and more mysterious than us, invoking both a sense of beauty and humility.
This reverence allows one to face reality and the unknown head-on without desperation's distracting, reactive emotions. It is a stance that encourages observing reality with open eyes, filled with respect and awe, rather than cowering in fear and sealing gaps with supernatural contrivances.
The profound reverence for the unknown held by the Union represents a holistic, mature, and rational approach to the mysteries of life. This reverence acknowledges the vastness of what remains unknown, coupled with an appreciation for humanity's journey of discovery and understanding. This reverence is an emotional and intellectual response, providing a balanced and enlightened perspective on the world and our place within it. The undiscovered mystery of the cosmos is our higher power; it humbly reminds us that we are but an infinitesimally tiny thread in an epic cosmic tapestry.
How did Mystrikism get started?
The inception of Mystrikism stems from an observation about our "spiritual" journey as a species. Historically, humans have sought to understand the unknown through supernatural beliefs and glorified superstitions, a legacy of our early days, barely off the Savannah. This was our first fear-driven, desperate attempt to make sense of the world around us. However, as we've advanced, so has our understanding of the universe and ourselves, although we've only begun to scratch the surface.
When confronted with the vast unknown, early humans turned to supernatural explanations to bring order to chaos. This was a natural response for a species striving to comprehend its environment. But as centuries passed, our species acquired new tools to decipher the world. Among these, the Scientific Method has been pivotal. It allows us to distinguish what is known, unknown, and as yet unknowable, moving us beyond simplistic labels and answers driven by fear and superstition.
Mystrikism is born from the belief that it's time for the more significant questions in life to be scrutinised with the same intellectual integrity. We should not be quick to settle for easy explanations but embrace our world's complexity. The Scientific Method isn't just for empirical inquiries; it's a beacon guiding us through the fog of superstition towards a clearer understanding of our place in the universe.
With this backdrop, Mystrikism emerges as a necessary voice in the "spiritual" discourse. Major religions often overshadow and bully non-supernatural viewpoints, leaving a gap for those who seek "spiritual" connection grounded in reality. Mystrikism represents those who wish to explore "spirituality" through the lens of modern understanding and rational thought.
Recognising the isolation many rational "spiritual" seekers feel, Mystrikism aims to create a community. It's a space where questions are encouraged, and "spirituality" is explored in a way that harmonises with our intellectual growth as a species.
Central to Mystrikism is Aweism, a concept that fosters a non-supernatural sense of awe, wonder and appreciation for the universe's beauty. Aweism is the belief that a naturalised "spirituality" can coexist with rationality. Mystrikism sees the universe, in all its complexity and marvel, as more than sufficient for spiritual fulfilment, negating the need for supernatural explanations.
Mystrikism is a response to our evolutionary journey from ancient superstitions to a more enlightened understanding of the world. It offers a path for those who seek to blend their "spiritual" quest with intellectual integrity, embracing the wonder of the universe through the lens of reason and scientific discovery.
.webp)
The Purpose Behind the Values of Mystricism
Mystrikism is anchored by two fundamental principles: kindness and honesty. By employing kindness, we cultivate a climate of harmony and peace, enabling a broad spectrum of minds to explore and appreciate the mysteries of the cosmos. Without compassion, our world is marred by suffering and strife, stifling opportunities for discovery and learning. We can genuinely engage with and understand the world only when we eliminate conflict and division. We must ensure that everyone is included in this quest, as each person perceives a unique facet of reality that contributes to our collective understanding. This collaboration reveals the intricate beauty of life, the universe's most precious jewel.
Honesty is equally vital. It demands that we confront our cognitive limitations, illusions of pride, and interpretations of truth. This honesty is upheld by the methods of science, the only honest and reliable system for finding the best approximate truth. Celebrating beauty only holds authenticity if it is rooted in reality and avoids the traps of fear, hope, and misconception.
The ultimate purpose of the principles of Mystrikism is to explore and reveal the mysteries of the universe, while appreciating its awesome beauty and sublime magnificence. The infinite unknown is our higher power, vast and ineffable; it epically dwarfs our ego and pride, driving us to pursue and understand its true essence. Humanity's presence in the universe is minuscule and fragile, as is our grasp on reality. Our journey is one of perpetual exploration, seeking true understanding and witnessing the inherent grace of the cosmos.
The Unknown: Our Higher Power and Purpose
When pondering our "Purpose to Life" and our version of a "Higher Power," we find a delicate balance reminiscent of the yin and yang. These concepts have two sides, each reflecting and complementing the other around the philosophical centrepiece of the infinite unknown. This harmony between the known and the mysterious highlights the dynamic interplay that shapes our understanding of existence.
Part 1 - A Power Greater than Ourselves
In the Mystrikal framework, our higher power isn't a deity or supernatural concept but the profound mysteries of the universe yet to be discovered. Instead of worshipping a divine entity, we revere the vast, awe-inspiring, unknown aspects of reality. This aligns with Mystrikism's principles of naturalism and the intentions of science, where belief in the supernatural is replaced by a deep respect for the natural world and its unexplored wonders.
Mystriks see the higher power as a guiding light rooted in the universe's limitless potential for discovery. This perspective celebrates the vast expanse of knowledge awaiting our insatiable curiosity rather than fearing what we don't yet understand. It acknowledges our modest place in the cosmos and embraces the journey toward understanding the myriad mysteries surrounding us. The vast unknown humbles our pride and ego, creating an environment where hubris cannot take root.
For those in recovery programs like Alcoholics Anonymous, the requirement to believe in a higher power can be a philosophical hurdle. Mystrikism offers a refreshing alternative where the higher power is the awe-inspiring unknown, not a god figure or other superstitious concept. This approach empowers individuals in recovery by providing strength and humility grounded in the natural world and sublime mystery, fostering a personal and meaningful "spiritual" journey. It instils hope and inspiration, reminding them there's always more to discover and understand.
Reverence for the unknown is central to Mystrikism, embodying a holistic and mature approach to life's mysteries. This reverence isn't based on supernatural feelings but on deep, complex emotions combining wonder, awe, respect, and humility. It encourages individuals to face reality head-on, observing it with open eyes filled with appreciation and veneration rather than cowering in fear and resorting to supernatural explanations.
Part 2 - The Meaning of Life
Mystrikism tackles the profound existential questions of life's purpose by embracing a search for relevance and significance beyond human-centred concerns. For millennia, people have turned to religion to answer the question: Why are we here? What is our purpose? The key to answering these questions is to ask another: What does it all mean? The answer: We don't know.
The answer is found in the search itself.
In Mystrikism, life's meaning and higher purpose are established in uncovering the unknown in a quest for discovery. When we unmask mystery and reveal the unknown, we witness beauty and receive knowledge, understanding and wisdom. This tenet embodies Mystrikism's philosophy, celebrating our endless journey of enlightenment.
So, let's embrace the unknown with a sense of adventure. Who needs all the answers when the quest itself is this exciting? After all, isn't it more fun to explore the cosmic treasure hunt of knowledge than to pretend we've already found the chest?
The Golden Rule - Part 1 of 2
Over the millennia, long after humanity left its arboreal origins, moved beyond the savannah, and expanded its understanding of the world, we began to uncover pieces of universal wisdom that remain undeniably and uncontroversially true. Among the most significant is known as the Golden Rule. This principle has appeared in virtually every religious, philosophical, and cultural teaching since the Earth’s crust cooled. It emphasises reciprocity and empathy, encouraging individuals to consider the feelings of others as they do their own.
Here are some well-known existing versions of the Golden Rule from various sources:
-
Christianity: "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." (Matthew 7:12, Bible)
-
Judaism: "What is hateful to you, do not do to your fellow man. This is the entire Law; all the rest is commentary." (Talmud, Shabbat 31a)
-
Islam: "None of you [truly] believes until he wishes for his brother what he wishes for himself." (Hadith)
-
Hinduism: "This is the sum of duty; do naught onto others what you would not have them do unto you." (Mahabharata 5:1517)
-
Buddhism: "Treat not others in ways that you yourself would find hurtful." (Udana-Varga 5.18)
-
Confucianism: "Do not do to others what you do not want done to yourself." (Analects 15:23)
-
Taoism: "Regard your neighbour's gain as your gain, and your neighbour's loss as your own loss." (T'ai Shang Kan Ying P'ien)
-
Zoroastrianism: "That nature alone is good which refrains from doing unto another whatsoever is not good for itself." (Dadistan-i-Dinik 94:5)
-
Sikhism: "I am a stranger to no one, and no one is a stranger to me. Indeed, I am a friend to all." (Guru Granth Sahib, p. 1299)
-
Baha'i Faith: "Lay not on any soul a load that you would not wish to be laid upon you, and desire not for anyone the things you would not desire for yourself." (Baha'u'llah, Gleanings)
-
Ancient Egypt: "Do for one who may do for you, that you may cause him thus to do." (The Tale of the Eloquent Peasant, 1800 BCE)
-
Native American (Cherokee): "Do not judge your neighbour until you walk two moons in his moccasins."
-
Jainism: "One should treat all creatures in the world as one would like to be treated." (Mahavira, Sutrakritanga)
-
Greek Philosophy (Socrates): "Do not do to others that which would anger you if others did it to you." (Socrates)
-
Humanism: "Don't do things you wouldn't want to have done to you." (British Humanist Society)
-
Unitarian Universalism: "We affirm and promote respect for the interdependent web of all existence of which we are a part." (Unitarian Principles)
-
African Traditional Religions: "One going to take a pointed stick to pinch a baby bird should first try it on himself to feel how it hurts." (Yoruba Proverb)
-
Shinto: "The heart of the person before you is a mirror. See there your own form." (Shinto Saying)
-
Plato's Republic: "May I do to others as I would that they should do unto me." (Plato)
-
Scientology: "Try to treat others as you would want them to treat you." (L. Ron Hubbard, The Way to Happiness)
The traditional Golden Rule, despite its wide appeal and longevity, contains several logical issues that can conflict with the principles of Mystrikism.
Our Golden Rule - Part 2 of 2
The Union of Mystriks has its version. Our incarnation of the Golden Rule acknowledges its original wisdom. Still, it is also aware that much time has passed since most of these variations were written, let alone revisited and upgraded.
Our Golden Rule is thus:
"Treat all life with kindness, honesty, respect and consideration."
Why We Chose Our Golden Rule and Moved Away from Traditional Versions
-
Recognition of Individuality - People are unique, with their own needs, values, and preferences. Traditional versions of the Golden Rule assume others want the same treatment we do, but this can lead to misunderstandings or even harm. Autonomy is about honouring someone’s right to make their own choices. Our version emphasises taking the time to understand and appreciate someone’s individuality instead of assuming “what’s good for me is good for you.”
-
Safeguards Against Harm - Older formulations leave room for misinterpretation, enabling justifications for harmful behaviour under the guise of reciprocity, e.g., "If I can endure this, others should too." Our Golden Rule, rooted in kindness and respect, establishes clear safeguards, ensuring actions are uplifting and considerate rather than harmful or dismissive.
-
Awareness of Power Dynamics - The traditional Golden Rule assumes equality of power and privilege, ignoring how actions can reinforce harmful hierarchies or imbalances. Our approach promotes humility and fairness by emphasising courtesy and consideration, encouraging actions that bridge divides rather than perpetuate inequality.
The Difference
Unlike traditional Golden Rules that rely on the actor's perspective or universal assumptions, our rule focuses on the recipient, celebrating individuality and adapting to the complexities of diverse contexts. This creates a foundation for more thoughtful, equitable, and compassionate interactions, reflecting a commitment to ethical living in line with Mystrikism’s principles.
The Golden Rule has been a cornerstone of ethical thought across cultures and ages, guiding humanity toward empathy, reciprocity, and mutual respect. The Union of Mystriks honours this timeless wisdom while embracing a modern understanding. Our enhanced and clarified version of the Golden Rule reflects our commitment to compassion and rectitude.
The Trinity of the Unknown
The concept of the unknown has always been a central feature of human thought. From our earliest ancestors to the present day, it has spurred curiosity, fear, reverence, and wonder. In Mystrikism, the unknown is not just a backdrop to our lives but the core of our higher meaning, purpose, and our naturalised "spirituality." These elements, represented by each facet of a trinity, offer a natural, rational, and "spiritual" guide to our lives, with the infinite unknown as the central feature.
Facet One: Aweism - Rational Inspiration
Aweism, a cornerstone of Mystrikism, celebrates the profound beauty and mystery of the universe without invoking the supernatural. It is in the grandeur of the cosmos, the intricacy of natural phenomena, and the depth of human connection that we find "spiritual" fulfilment. The experiences that provoke feelings of wonder, connection, awe, and joy are not known or fully understood, highlighting the role of the unknown in these transcendent moments.
For instance, consider the experience of standing beneath a vast, star-filled sky. The sheer enormity and beauty of the cosmos can evoke a deep sense of wonder and awe, reminding us of the limits of our knowledge and the vastness of what remains to be discovered. This differs from the satisfaction from well-understood physiological experiences, such as enjoying a delicious meal, sexual gratification or the endorphin rush after exercise. While these are wonderful, they do not capture the transcendent quality that Aweism seeks to highlight. Instead, the extraordinary moments, like witnessing a solar eclipse, feeling the profound connection during a moving piece of music, or contemplating the complexities of life and the universe in quiet solitude, embody Aweism. These moments are not fully understood and are rooted in the unknown, providing a rational yet profoundly "spiritual" experience.
Facet Two: Purpose - The Eternal Search
The second facet of our trinity focuses on purpose. Beyond mere survival and reproduction, the ultimate purpose of intelligent life, as posited by Mystrikism, is to unveil and understand the unknown. This drive for knowledge and understanding is deeply embedded in our nature and propels us forward in our eternal quest to explore the mysteries of the universe.
The pursuit of uncovering the unknown aligns with the core values of science and rational inquiry. Historically, each discovery we make only reveals deeper complexities and further mysteries, expanding the frontiers of our knowledge. This continuous discovery process advances our understanding and reinforces that the dynamic unknown is effectively infinite and our search virtually perpetual.
In practical terms, this pursuit of purpose manifests in various ways. Scientists investigating the fundamental particles of matter, explorers venturing into uncharted territories, and individuals seeking to understand the depths of human consciousness all contribute to this collective endeavour.
The unknown drives innovation fuels our curiosity, unveils beauty, and ultimately enriches our understanding of the cosmos and our purpose within it. Carl Sagan said it best, "We are a way for the cosmos to know itself." Symbolically speaking, this reflects the notion that human consciousness and intelligence are mechanisms through which the universe gains self-awareness.
Facet Three: The Infinite Unknown as our "Higher Power"
The third facet of the trinity positions the unknown as a rational version of our "higher power". This epic disparity in perspective subdues our hubris and egotism, promoting a sense of humility and awe. For sensible, sceptical, scientific individuals, the mysteries of reality are the only power greater than ourselves that does not conflict with logical thought, the Mystrikal values of naturalism, and the ideals of science.
When viewed as infinitely vast, the unknown aligns with historical precedents, where each scientific discovery unveils new layers of complexity. This scientifically rational perspective acknowledges that our knowledge is limited and our ignorance is eternal. It promotes epistemic humility, recognising the boundaries of our understanding while encouraging continuous inquiry and exploration. This aligns with the principles of falsifiability and Bayesian reasoning, which underpin the methods of science.
In Mystrikism, revering the infinite unknown as our "higher power" complements the values of humility, honesty, and awe. It acknowledges the eternal vastness of our nescience, promoting a sense of wonder and inspiring lifelong curiosity. This reverence for the unknown does not imply a supernatural, paranormal or divine force, with no mind, personality, agenda, or awareness. Instead, it reflects a deep respect for the mysteries around us, encouraging us to approach them with an open mind and a humble heart.
The True Test of Kindness
Kindness, often seen as a gentle, effortless virtue, a joy to bestow upon others, holds a deeper truth. Genuine kindness, far from being a simple act, is at its most potent and transformative when it is most challenging to practice. The true measure of kindness is not in the ease of its expression but in its endurance under pressure and adversity.
In everyday life, showing kindness when reciprocated or appreciated can be a source of joy and satisfaction. These moments reaffirm our positive self-image and reinforce our social bonds. Yet, these instances do not test the depth of our capacity for kindness. The true strength of our kindness is revealed in the crucible of conflict, discomfort, and personal affronts.
Imagine a situation where your pride is under assault, where you feel belittled, embarrassed, or shamed. Our instinctual responses often lean towards defensiveness, anger, or retribution in such moments. In the heat of emotional turmoil, it is precisely here that choosing kindness becomes a profound act of human will. When kindness is least deserved by others, when they have wronged or shown us contempt, our decision to respond with patience, compassion, and understanding holds the greatest potential for positive impact.
The irony of kindness lies in its most significant power emerging when it is most difficult to manifest. By extending kindness in the face of provocation, we uphold our moral integrity and break the cycle of negativity. This act of grace can disarm hostility, foster reconciliation, and promote healing in ways that retaliation or cold indifference never could.
Furthermore, demonstrating kindness in challenging circumstances is a testament to our inner strength and resilience. It signifies a triumph over our primal animal instincts and a dedication to our higher human values. This fosters a sense of inner peace and self-respect, affirming that we have acted in alignment with our principles and maintained personal control despite the pressures to do otherwise.
When our pride is under siege, when we feel the sting of condescension, and when we are most tempted to forsake our Mystrikal principles, kindness becomes a revolutionary act. Choosing this arduous path not only enriches our own lives but also plants seeds of compassion and understanding in the hearts of others, initiating waves of positive change in a world often scarred by conflict and division.
The True Test of Kindness: Exceptions
Kindness is a cornerstone of the Mystrikal ethos. Yet, common sense informs us that the practice of kindness is not without its limits, and certain situations may necessitate deviations from this principle. These exceptions, though rare, require careful contemplation, patience and a nuanced understanding of the ethical situation.
Protecting Oneself and Others
One significant exception arises in situations where personal safety or the safety of others is at risk. If showing kindness to an aggressor endangers oneself or others, it may be necessary to take protective measures that, on the surface, may appear unkind. For instance, setting firm boundaries with someone abusive or harmful is an act of self-preservation and protection for potential victims. In such cases, the principle of kindness is not abandoned but redefined as a duty to prevent harm.
Upholding Justice and Accountability
Another exception to the rule of kindness involves upholding justice and accountability. At times, leniency could perpetuate injustice or allow harmful behaviour to continue unchecked. Addressing systemic injustices or confronting unethical practices may require firm and uncompromising actions. Holding individuals or institutions accountable for their actions, even if they cause discomfort or hardship, aligns with a broader conception of kindness, including the well-being of the larger community and upholding moral integrity.
Responding to Manipulation and Deceit
Those with manipulative intentions can sometimes exploit kindness. In such scenarios, responding with unwavering kindness may inadvertently enable deceit or perpetuate a cycle of manipulation. Recognising when to draw the line is crucial. Setting boundaries and, if necessary, withdrawing kindness in these situations can prevent further exploitation and encourage accountability. This approach promoted a healthier dynamic based on respect and honesty.
Defending Freedoms Against Unjust Restrictions
In some situations, kindness may need to take a backseat to defend fundamental freedoms, especially when social contracts are violated without meaningful, consensual justification. When freedoms are restricted arbitrarily, standing up against such encroachments might require actions that, while not immediately kind, are necessary to preserve liberty and justice for the greater good. This stance ensures that the principles underpinning a just society are upheld.
Managing Chronic Conflict and Hostility
Adopting a more assertive approach may become necessary in environments where chronic conflict or hostility persists despite repeated efforts to encourage understanding and reconciliation. This does not mean abandoning kindness altogether; instead, it means prioritising establishing a stable, respectful environment where meaningful dialogue can occur. In such cases, kindness might take the form of decisive actions to remove toxic influences or to enforce boundaries that protect the well-being of the broader community.
Addressing Persistent Negativity
When faced with individuals who consistently exhibit negativity or disruptive behaviour, kindness must be balanced with maintaining a positive and productive environment. After multiple attempts to engage kindly and offer support, it may be necessary to take steps that protect the group’s overall harmony and functionality. This could involve setting stricter limits on negative behaviour or, in extreme cases, removing the individual from the situation to safeguard the collective well-being.
Navigating Irreconcilable Differences
In situations where irreconcilable differences exist and all efforts at mediation and understanding have failed, it may be necessary to accept that a harmonious resolution is impossible. Here, kindness might manifest as a respectful but firm acknowledgment of these differences, allowing each party to pursue their paths without further conflict. This approach respects the dignity of all involved and avoids the futility of forced reconciliation, which can lead to greater resentment and discord.
Dealing with Immediate Crises
In immediate crises, such as natural disasters or emergencies, the urgency might override the usual practices of kindness. Quick, decisive actions that prioritise safety and stability may be necessary, even if they seem abrupt or harsh. In these moments, the focus shifts to crisis management and survival, with the understanding that kindness can be restored once the immediate danger has passed and stability is regained.
Balancing Kindness with Self-Care
Finally, kindness must be balanced with self-care. Constantly prioritising others' needs at the expense of one's well-being can lead to burnout and resentment. Recognising the importance of self-kindness ensures we maintain our capacity to be genuinely kind to others. This balance is critical; it sustains our emotional health and reinforces the authenticity of our kindness.
While kindness remains a fundamental principle of Mystrikism, understanding its limits and exceptions is crucial. These exceptions do not undermine the value of kindness but enrich our ethical framework, allowing us to navigate complex situations with wisdom and integrity. All these exceptions should be seen as a last resort only after several different strategies of kindness have been attempted and found insufficient. Recognising these boundaries ensures that our commitment to kindness is sustainable and meaningful, promoting a harmonious world where compassion and justice coexist.
The True Test of Kindness: Violence
In extreme circumstances, defensive violence may become necessary to protect oneself or others from imminent harm. This exception to kindness does not endorse aggression but recognises that self-defence, employing only the minimum force required to ensure safety and security, is sometimes unavoidable. Such actions must always be a last resort for a Mystrik, undertaken only after all other de-escalation strategies and non-violent resolution have been exhausted.
For those rare instances where defensive violence is necessary, one might consider learning and applying martial arts with a strong emphasis on defensive actions and restraining techniques, such as Aikido, Judo, or the defensive features of Jiu-Jitsu. These disciplines focus on self-defence, using an opponent’s force against them, and controlling or subduing attackers without causing unnecessary harm.
For example, in extreme situations, such as being attacked while walking home, one might need to use defensive violence. This can be in the form of blocking strikes, disarming your opponent if armed, applying a hold to subdue, or, in extreme circumstances, offensive actions to incapacitate to protect others or to escape harm personally.
In certain dire situations, defensive violence on a larger scale, such as in war, may become necessary to protect a community, country, or group from existential threats. This form of violence is justified when all avenues of peaceful resolution have been thoroughly exhausted, and the threat remains imminent and severe. In these circumstances, thoughtful preemptive plans and preparations are also considered logical and ethical. Defensive war aims to preserve life, liberty, and essential values, using force strictly as a last resort.
For example, During World War II, the Battle of Britain was a notable example of defensive violence. In 1940, facing the threat of Nazi invasion, Britain had no choice but to engage in aerial combat to protect its territory and people. The Royal Air Force (RAF) defended the nation against relentless attacks by the German Luftwaffe. This defence was crucial to safeguarding the freedoms and lives of millions, preventing occupation, and maintaining the nation’s sovereignty. While violent, The RAF’s actions were necessary to protect the country and uphold justice, demonstrating that sometimes, the defence of a community or nation requires force when no other options remain.
The True Test of Kindness: Argument
In line with the principles of Mystrikism, it is crucial to approach verbal conflicts with kindness, honesty, and rationality. When confronted with abusive or harmful language, we must first recognise that much of the discomfort and urge to retaliate stems from our ego and pride reacting to these provocations. Acknowledging this helps us respond with greater clarity and thoughtfulness.
Recognise and Manage Your Emotional Response:
When faced with insults or disrespect, pause and remind yourself that your anger or frustration is often an automatic, primal animal reaction. This recognition is empowering; it allows you to distance yourself from those emotions and see the situation more clearly as if someone is attempting to provoke or diminish you. Doing so reduces the emotional charge and gives you the mental space needed to respond mindfully.
Ignore or Remove Yourself:
The simplest advice is often the most effective. If the disrespect is not harming or affecting others and is solely directed at you, disengaging or physically removing yourself from the situation can prevent unnecessary escalation and preserve your peace of mind.
When Silence is Not an Option:
However, when harmful or irrational ideas are spread to a broader audience, silence can be interpreted as consent. As Edmund Burke famously said, “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.” In such cases, verbal self-defence becomes necessary to protect well-being, mitigate suffering and uphold honesty.
Verbal self-defence in Mystrikism is defensive, not offensive, as with physical self-defence. The goal is not to belittle but to protect and clarify. Your response should be firm but grounded in kindness, motivated by the need to counter harmful misinformation or dangerous ideas.
The Defensive Approach:
When you choose to engage, remember your goal is not to humiliate but to defend the values of kindness, honesty, and rationality. A well-reasoned response, calmly and respectfully delivered, can serve as a powerful counterbalance to destructive rhetoric. Address the ideas, not the person, and focus on the impact of what’s being said.
Maintaining Kindness and Rationality:
When defending yourself or others, your goal should always be to encourage understanding and uphold Mystrikism’s values. This posture should never devolve into offensive attacks. The line between defence and offence must remain clear: we engage to prevent harm, not to cause more.
When silence implies complicity or harmful behaviour and destructive ideas go unchallenged, they may be seen as endorsement. Therefore, stepping up to defend what is right without escalating the conflict is sometimes necessary. As Abraham Lincoln said, “To sin by silence, when they should protest, makes cowards of men.”
Our Ultimate Purpose
The Union of Mystriks is not a vague gathering or a nefarious cult seeking to ensnare unwitting individuals. We are a community committed to promoting rational thought, scientific inquiry, and ethical principles based on scientifically measurable well-being without supernatural elements. Our commitment to these values is unwavering, and we focus on creating a space for individuals genuinely interested in living these principles and possessing a clear identity.
Ultimately, however, the principles of Mystrikism aim to encourage sapient beings to explore and uncover the dynamic mysteries of the universe while marvelling at its beauty and magnificence, from the inner workings of our consciousness and humanity’s potential to the exploration of the infinite depths of both the macro and micro cosmos and potential multiverses.
We revere the infinite unknown as our rational higher power. This vast and ineffable mystery epically dwarfs our pride and egocentrism, driving us to pursue and comprehend its true essence. Humanity's presence in the universe is minuscule and fragile, as is our grasp on reality. A Mystrik’s journey is of perpetual exploration, seeking the best approximation of truth and expanding our understanding of the cosmos's inherent grace.
Your journey as a Mystrik is not just about perpetual exploration and the pursuit of truth. It’s about engaging with kindness and expanding your understanding of the cosmos’s inherent grace. If you need further clarification, we invite you to visit our website and delve into our material. After all, an informed member is the cornerstone of our philosophy.
The Beginnings of the Union
[Audio version]
Growing up in 1970s Australia, religion wasn’t much of a guiding force in my life. It was more like background noise. I went through “religious instruction” in primary school, which was basically mandatory Sunday school. We learned Bible stories like Christmas, Easter, Noah’s Ark, yada, yada. But my parents weren’t particularly religious. My dad might’ve called himself an atheist once or twice, but he never made a big deal of it. My mum believed in God but rarely talked about it. Religion just wasn’t something we discussed. The closest we got to engaging with it was attending weddings, funerals, and the occasional christening. Still, as a kid, I had those moments where I’d pray to bargain my way out of trouble: “God, fix this, and I’ll be good, I swear!” Spoiler: neither the fixing nor the promises stuck. It was a phase many kids probably go through.
Things shifted around grade 4 when I discovered books, not because I was a precocious reader but because I had a crush on a girl who was reading The Lord of the Rings. I read it to impress her. The crush fizzled, but my love for intellectual exploration didn’t. By puberty, I’d already started calling myself an atheist, though I barely understood what that really meant. At the time, it was less about deeply held beliefs and more about rebelling, an anti-authoritarian streak I probably inherited from my dad, who I saw as rigid and unyielding. I wasn’t a serious atheist, just a defiant kid figuring things out.
In my late teens and early 20s, I wandered into the world of serious "woo". New Age spirituality, reiki, drumming circles, and more than a few chemically enhanced psychedelic “journeys” made their way into my life. At one point, I convinced myself I was an empath, holding people’s wrists and rambling about their emotions. Spoiler: it was just cold reading. Looking back, it’s all a bit ridiculous and cringe-worthy. This phase fortunately ended when I finally ditched the crystal necklace I once wore very proudly.
Then came the swing to the other extreme: militant, adamantine anti-theism. I devoured Hitchens, embraced hard scepticism, and became the kind of person who’d argue about religion at the drop of a hat. But eventually, I calmed down. Thank fuck. Over time, I found myself drawn to secular humanism. It was close to what I was looking for, but still, something about it didn’t feel quite right. It felt incomplete like it was merely an attempt to rebrand atheism or agnosticism as something more palatable. It seemed like a decorative basket to present rationalism or a spoonful of sugar to make the medicine go down.
Around this time, I was knee-deep in a creative project: constructing a language called Zhoozhee. Like many families from other parts of the world, my wife and I wanted a private language. Esperanto initially seemed promising, but it didn’t scratch the itch, so I made my own. Over years of work, I built a functional language with a dictionary of over 10,000 words. This project is still ongoing and will probably never be “finished.”
But here’s why that matters: creating Zhoozhee mirrored my philosophical journey. Just as Esperanto didn’t quite fit my linguistic goals, atheism and humanism didn’t fully meet my existential needs. Atheism is just a position on the question of gods (and the supernatural to many as well), and agnosticism is about the limits of knowledge and knowability. Neither, on their own, offers a complete worldview or a framework for life. Traditional religions, for all their supernatural baggage, provide a lot: guidance on how to live, find meaning, and connect with something greater than oneself.
That realisation planted the seeds of Mystrikism. I wanted something that could offer what religion does but without the irrational dogma and supernatural baggage. I envisioned a framework grounded in reason, ethics, and awe, a rational, naturalistic way to live a meaningful life. As someone who fully embraces the fact that I’m a certified moron, I needed to build an intellectual framework that acknowledges human imperfection while providing ethical guidance rooted in the self-correcting methods of science and the undeniable power of compassion.
Creating Mystrikism wasn’t about reinventing the wheel, it was about building a syncretic system that draws from the best ideas across human history, cultures, philosophies, and religions while grounding everything in natural reality. In Mystrikism, “truth” is always provisional, what we call the “best approximate of truth”, always open to revision as we learn more. The methodologies of science are central to its ethos because science is the most reliable way we’ve found to sift truth from error despite our human flaws.
Ethics are equally fundamental. Mystrikism prioritises kindness and the reduction of suffering for all life (not overly focused on humanity), including nature’s ecosystems and the environment. And then there’s the sense of awe, what some might call “spirituality”, but entirely naturalised, with no superstitious elements.
Over time, the idea evolved. I realised Mystrikism could be more than a personal philosophy, it could serve as a unifying identity that others might appreciate and resonate with. The term Union was chosen deliberately. Just as workers form unions to address the power imbalance between individuals and industrial owners, I saw a similar need for non-believers.
While humanism is profoundly admirable, it remains inherently constrained (it’s right there in the name itself). Despite their considerable numbers, unbelievers and sceptics are often disadvantaged. They lack political influence and struggle to compete with the cohesion and organisation of entrenched superstitious ideologies. At best, fragmented and isolated communities, and at worst, mere individuals, are left to challenge these vast forces alone, without the collective framework or momentum needed to steer humanity toward a genuinely rational and ethical future.
The Union of Mystriks aims to transform this dynamic. Rooted in shared principles and mutual growth, it offers a collective identity and purpose for those who reject the paranormal on scientific grounds yet crave meaning, purpose and inspiration firmly anchored in reality. More than just an ethos, Mystrikism is a source of empowerment, bridging the divide between isolated individuals and a shared vision for a rational, ethical, and awe-filled future.
The Unyielding Pillars of Mystrikism
In the Union of Mystriks, ethical decision-making rests on two unwavering stanchions: kindness, the pursuit of well-being for all, and honesty, grounded in scientific methodologies. While compromise is often crucial in resolving conflicts and reconciling competing ideas, Mystrikism draws a firm line at these foundational principles. Kindness and scientific honesty are non-negotiable, as diluting these principles undercuts their transformative power.
Instead of settling for “middle ground” solutions that compromise either value, Mystrikism rejects binary thinking, particularly when it comes to its core principles. We strive to discover innovative paths honouring kindness and honesty, ensuring neither is sacrificed. This approach isn’t about being inflexible. It’s about refusing to settle. It reflects a commitment to move beyond transactional compromises and embrace deeper, more integrative, and adaptive solutions.
For Mystriks, kindness boils down to a simple question: Does this action promote flourishing or reduce suffering? That’s it. It’s not about avoiding discomfort to protect someone’s self-importance or unquestioningly accepting beliefs without thoughtful evaluation. Instead, kindness is an active effort to safeguard well-being and minimise harm for all, rooted in both empathy and reason. While emotional suffering warrants compassion, it’s equally important to recognise when it stems from cognitive dissonance or pride-driven agendas rather than genuine conflicts between well-intentioned ideas. True kindness empowers informed decisions and fosters peaceful coexistence, never sacrificing collective well-being or the pursuit of truth to appease ideological or political absolutes.
As understood in Mystrikism, honesty relies on science’s integrated methods to uncover the secrets of reality. Far from being impersonal, scientific honesty enhances and builds upon compassion when grounding actions and beliefs in verified, falsifiable evidence. This ensures that our pursuit of truth is both objective and deeply respectful of individual dignity and autonomy.
History shows that genuine and meaningful progress emerges when science and compassion are pursued hand in hand. Mystrikism encourages curiosity, creativity, and courage by refusing to compromise on these principles, driving solutions where these values thrive in harmony. In doing so, we aim to inspire transformative change, not by settling for less but by striving for better.
